Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 16:3:77.
doi: 10.21037/tgh.2018.09.16. eCollection 2018.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for Barrett's adenocarcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for Barrett's adenocarcinoma

Emanuele Asti et al. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. .

Abstract

Minimally invasive esophagectomy has become the preferred approach for invasive Barrett's adenocarcinoma because it can speed recovery and enhance patient's quality of life. Multiple minimally invasive surgical techniques have been described during the last two decades. Preoperative staging, anatomy and physiological patient's status, comorbidity, and experience of the surgical team should drive the choice of the surgical approach. The trans-thoracic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, either hybrid or totally minimal invasive, remains the preferred approach in these patients. Lymph node yield and short-term clinical outcomes have proven similar to open surgery, while quality of life appears improved. To establish a minimally invasive esophagectomy program, a steep learning curve and a multidisciplinary approach are required in order to provide optimal staging, personalized therapy, and adequate perioperative care. The role of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of invasive Barrett's adenocarcinoma will continue to expand in synergy with enhanced recovery after surgery pathways.

Keywords: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC); Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; laparoscopy; minimally invasive esophagectomy; thoracoscopy; trans-hiatal esophagectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Laparoscopic view: construction of the gastric conduit by stapler.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Thoracoscopic access using trocars and 5-cm mini-thoracotomy without rib spreading.
Figure 3
Figure 3
View of the intrathoracic esophago-gastric anastomosis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Preserved cosmesis of the chest wall after total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography performed at the time of thoracoscopic anastomosis. Note the intramural vascular network along the gastric tube and at the anastomotic site.

References

    1. Inadomi J, Alastal H, Bonavina L, et al. Recent advances in Barrett's esophagus. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2018. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/nyas.13909 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edgren G, Adami HO, Weiderpass E, et al. A global assessment of the oesophageal adenocarcinoma epidemic. Gut 2013;62:1406-14. Erratum in: Gut 2013;62:1820. Weiderpass Vainio, Elisabete [corrected to Weiderpass, Elisabete]. 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302412 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnold M, Laversanne M, Brown LM, et al. Predicting the Future Burden of Esophageal Cancer by Histological Subtype: International Trends in Incidence up to 2030. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:1247-55. 10.1038/ajg.2017.155 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jagot P, Sauvanet A, Berthoux L, et al. Laparoscopic mobilization of the stomach for oesophageal replacement. Br J Surg 1996;83:540-2. 10.1002/bjs.1800830435 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonavina L, Bona D, Binyom PR, et al. A laparoscopy-assisted surgical approach to esophageal carcinoma. J Surg Res 2004;117:52-7. 10.1016/j.jss.2003.11.007 - DOI - PubMed