Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018;73 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):53-64.
doi: 10.1159/000494783. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

Risk Assessment Paradigm for Glutamate

Ashley Roberts  1 , Barry Lynch  1 , Ivonne M C M Rietjens  2
Affiliations
Review

Risk Assessment Paradigm for Glutamate

Ashley Roberts et al. Ann Nutr Metab. 2018.

Abstract

Background: Re-evaluation of the use of glutamic acid and glutamate salts (referred to as glutamate hereafter) by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) proposed a group acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 30 mg/kg body weight (bw)/day.

Summary: This ADI is below the normal dietary intake, while even intake of free glutamate by breast-fed babies can be above this ADI. In addition, the pre-natal developmental toxicity study selected by EFSA, has never been used by regulatory authorities worldwide for the safety assessment of glutamate despite it being available for nearly 40 years. Also, the EFSA ignored that toxicokinetic data provide support for eliminating the use of an uncertainty factor for interspecies differences in kinetics. Key Messages: A 3-generation reproductive toxicity study in mice that includes extensive brain histopathology, provides a better point of departure showing no effects up to the highest dose tested of 6,000 mg/kg bw/day. Furthermore, kinetic data support use of a compound-specific uncertainty factor of 25 instead of 100. Thus, an ADI of at least 240 mg/kg bw/day would be indicated. In fact, there is no compelling evidence to indicate that the previous ADI of "not specified" warrants any change.

Keywords: Acceptable daily intake; Glutamate; Macronutrient; Risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. WHO: Principles for the Safety Assessment of Food Additives and Contaminants in Food World Health Organization (WHO)/International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS)/United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Environmental Health Criteria. 1987;70 http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc70.htm.
    1. EFSA: Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of glutamic acid (E 620), sodium glutamate (E 621), potassium glutamate (E622), calcium glutamate (E 623), ammonium glutamate (E 624), and magnesium glutamate (E 625) as food additives (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food/ANS) (Question no EFSA-Q-2011-00577, EFSA-Q-2011-00578, EFSA-Q-2011-00579, EFSA-Q-2011-00580, EFSA-Q-2011-00581, EFSA-Q-2011-0582, adopted: 21 June 2017) EFSA J. 2017;15:4910. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/4910.
    1. Vorhees CV, Butcher RE, Brunner RL, Sobotka TJ. A developmental test battery for neurobehavioral toxicity in rats: a preliminary analysis using MSG calcium carrageenan, and hydroxyurea. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1979;50:267–282. - PubMed
    1. SCF: Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food. Twenty-fifth series. First series of food additives of various technological functions Opinion expressed on 18 May 1990. Published by the Commission of The European Communities Directorate-General Telecommunications, Information Industries and Innovation L-2920 Luxembourg. EUR 13416. 1991 Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/40834/1/25th_food.pdf.
    1. JECFA: Miscellaneous food additives L-Glutamic acid and its ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monosodium, and potassium salts; in JECFA: Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. Geneva, 31st Meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), February 16–25, 1987. World Health Organization (WHO), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) WHO Technical Report Series. 1987;759:29–31. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_759.pdf.