Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 Dec 3;6(1):135.
doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0427-6.

Which is the optimal immunotherapy for advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in combination with chemotherapy: anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1?

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Which is the optimal immunotherapy for advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in combination with chemotherapy: anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1?

Yaxiong Zhang et al. J Immunother Cancer. .

Abstract

Recent randomized phase III trials (KEYNOTE-407 and IMpower131) reported that adding anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) antibodies in combination with taxane-platinum improve the therapeutic efficacy for advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is no head-to-head comparison of pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) plus chemotherapy vs. atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) plus chemotherapy. Therefore, we performed an indirect comparison to explore the optimal choice of anti-PD-(L)1 treatment for advanced squamous NSCLC in combination with chemotherapy. The clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse event (AE). For overall patients, pembrolizumab had significantly superior OS (hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval, 0.67, 0.47-0.94; P = 0.02) and numerically better PFS (HR, 0.79, 0.60-1.04; P = 0.10) than atezolizumab, while they had similar ORR, all cause AE and grade 3-5 AE. For PD-L1 high patients, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab showed similar OS and PFS. However, for PD-L1 low/negative patients, pembrolizumab had superior OS (HR, 0.43, 0.24-0.76; P < 0.01/ HR, 0.74, 0.40-1.38; P = 0.35) and better PFS (HR, 0.80, 0.51-1.26; P = 0.33/ HR, 0.46, 0.28-0.75; P <0.01) than atezolizumab. Our analysis raises the hypothesis that anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in combination with chemotherapy may have superior efficacy compared to anti-PD-L1 antibody combination for patients with PD-L1 low/negative advanced squamous NSCLC.

Keywords: Anti-PD-1; Anti-PD-L1; Atezolizumab; NSCLC; Pembrolizumab; Squamous.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram of the indirect comparison between pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs. atezolizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Solid lines between treatment regimens represented the existence of direct comparisons. N = enrolled patient number

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morgensztern D, Campo MJ, Dahlberg SE, Doebele RC, Garon E, Gerber DE, Goldberg SB, Hammerman PS, Heist RS, Hensing T. Molecularly targeted therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer annual update 2014. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(1):1–63. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000405. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ettinger D, Wood D, Aisner D, Akerley W, Bauman J, Chirieac L, D'Amico T, DeCamp M, Dilling T, Dobelbower M, Doebele R, Govindan R, Gubens M, Hennon M, Horn L, Komaki R, Lackner R, Lanuti M, Leal T, Leisch L, Lilenbaum R, Lin J, Loo B, Martins R, Otterson G, Reckamp K, Riely G, Schild S, Shapiro T, Stevenson J, Swanson S, Tauer K, Yang S, Gregory K, Hughes M. Non-small cell lung Cancer, version 5.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(4):504–535. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0050. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paz-Ares Luis G., Luft Alexander, Tafreshi Ali, Gumus Mahmut, Mazieres Julien, Hermes Barbara, Cay Senler Filiz, Fülöp Andrea, Rodriguez-Cid Jeronimo, Sugawara Shunichi, Cheng Ying, Novello Silvia, Halmos Balazs, Shentu Yue, Kowalski Dariusz. Phase 3 study of carboplatin-paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel (Chemo) with or without pembrolizumab (Pembro) for patients (Pts) with metastatic squamous (Sq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2018;36(15_suppl):105–105. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.105. - DOI
    1. Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, Vynnychenko I, Stroyakovskiy D, Abreu DR, Hussein MA, Soo RA, Conter HJ, Kozuki T, Silva C, Graupner V, Sun S, Lin RS, Kelsch C, Kowanetz M, Hoang T, Sandler A, Socinski MA. IMpower131: Primary PFS and safety analysis of a randomized phase III study of atezolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel vs carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel as 1L therapy in advanced squamous NSCLC. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(18_suppl):LBA9000. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.18_suppl.LBA9000. - DOI
    1. Socinski M, Bondarenko I, Karaseva N, Makhson A, Vynnychenko I, Okamoto I, Hon J, Hirsh V, Bhar P, Zhang H, Iglesias J, Renschler M. Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: final results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(17):2055–2062. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5848. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms