Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 28;24(44):4974-4978.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i44.4974.

Learning curves in minimally invasive esophagectomy

Affiliations
Review

Learning curves in minimally invasive esophagectomy

Frans van Workum et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Surgical innovation and pioneering are important for improving patient outcome, but can be associated with learning curves. Although learning curves in surgery are a recognized problem, the impact of surgical learning curves is increasing, due to increasing complexity of innovative surgical procedures, the rapid rate at which new interventions are implemented and a decrease in relative effectiveness of new interventions compared to old interventions. For minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), there is now robust evidence that implementation can lead to significant learning associated morbidity (morbidity during a learning curve, that could have been avoided if patients were operated by surgeons that have completed the learning curve). This article provides an overview of the evidence of the impact of learning curves after implementation of MIE. In addition, caveats for implementation and available evidence regarding factors that are important for safe implementation and safe pioneering of MIE are discussed.

Keywords: Learning curve; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Pioneering; Proficiency gain curve; Safe implementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. The work has not been previously published and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scenarios in which the differences in the impact that learning curves can have on the effectiveness of an innovative intervention is described. A: Learning curves can be neglected in case of a short learning curve and large difference in relative effectiveness between the regular technique and the innovative technique. B: If the learning curve of an innovative technique is substantial and the difference in relative effectiveness is small, learning curves can have a large impact on when an innovative technique becomes effective.

References

    1. Hopper AN, Jamison MH, Lewis WG. Learning curves in surgical practice. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83:777–779. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT. Assessment of the learning curve in health technologies. A systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:1095–1108. - PubMed
    1. Wright TP. Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J Aeronaut Sci. 1936;3:122–128.
    1. Harrysson IJ, Cook J, Sirimanna P, Feldman LS, Darzi A, Aggarwal R. Systematic review of learning curves for minimally invasive abdominal surgery: a review of the methodology of data collection, depiction of outcomes, and statistical analysis. Ann Surg. 2014;260:37–45. - PubMed
    1. Khan N, Abboudi H, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Measuring the surgical ‘learning curve’: methods, variables and competency. BJU Int. 2014;113:504–508. - PubMed

MeSH terms