Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Jun 15;144(12):2918-2927.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.32034. Epub 2019 Jan 15.

Lung cancer risk by geologic coal deposits: A case-control study of female never-smokers from Xuanwei and Fuyuan, China

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Lung cancer risk by geologic coal deposits: A case-control study of female never-smokers from Xuanwei and Fuyuan, China

Jason Y Y Wong et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

Coal types vary around the world because of geochemical differences in their source deposits; however, the influence of coal emissions from different deposits on human health remains unexplored. To address this issue, we conducted the first study of the relationship between coal use from various deposits and lung cancer risk in Xuanwei and Fuyuan, counties in China where lung cancer rates are among the highest in the world among female never-smokers due to use of bituminous ("smoky") coal for heating and cooking. We conducted a population-based case-control study of 1031 lung cancer cases and 493 controls among never-smoking women in Xuanwei and Fuyuan. Logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between coal use from various deposits across the lifecourse and lung cancer risk. There was substantial heterogeneity in risks by coal deposit (p = 7.8E-05). Compared to non-smoky coal users, risks by smoky coal deposit ranged from OR = 7.49 (95% CI: 3.43-16.38) to OR = 33.40 (95% CI: 13.07-85.34). Further, women born into homes that used smoky coal and subsequently changed to non-smoky coal had a higher risk (OR = 10.83 (95% CI: 4.61-25.46)) than women born into homes that used non-smoky coal and changed to smoky coal (OR = 4.74 (95% CI: 2.03-11.04, pdifference = 0.04)). Our study demonstrates that various sources of coal have considerably different impact on lung cancer in this population and suggests that early-life exposure to carcinogenic emissions may exert substantial influence on health risks later in life. These factors should be considered when evaluating the health risks posed by exposure to coal combustion emissions.

Keywords: bituminous “smoky” coal; geographic variation; geologic coal deposit; indoor air pollution; lung cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Map of Geological Coal Deposits in Xuanwei and Fuyuan Counties of Yunnan, China. Coal deposits are designated by numbers. The distinctiveness of geologic deposits across Xuanwei and Fuyuan, which reflect differences in coalification or depositional environment, are indicated by the subcategorization of smoky coal into coking coal, 1/3 coking coal, gas fat coal and meager lean coal. This subcategorization was based on the degree of coalification and caking property characteristics as defined by the State Standard of China Coal Classification. *Historically a smokeless coal area that is recently transitioning to smoky coal, wood, and dung.

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Air Pollution, percentage of population using biomass fuels. Millennium Indicators Database, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Economic and Social Development, Statistics Division. https://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd/mdg/
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group I. 2013;103. https://monographs.iarc.fr/iarc-monographs-on-the-evaluation-of-carcinog...
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group I. 2005;92. https://monographs.iarc.fr/iarc-monographs-on-the-evaluation-of-carcinog...
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group I.100E. https://monographs.iarc.fr/iarc-monographs-on-the-evaluation-of-carcinog...
    1. Hosgood HD 3rd, Wei H, Sapkota A, et al. Household coal use and lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies, with an emphasis on geographic variation. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40:719–28. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types