Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 30;8(4):80.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics8040080.

Imaging as a Personalized Biomarker for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification

Affiliations
Review

Imaging as a Personalized Biomarker for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification

Kyle H Gennaro et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Biomarkers provide objective data to guide clinicians in disease management. Prostate-specific antigen serves as a biomarker for screening of prostate cancer but has come under scrutiny for detection of clinically indolent disease. Multiple imaging techniques demonstrate promising results for diagnosing, staging, and determining definitive management of prostate cancer. One such modality, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), detects more clinically significant disease while missing lower volume and clinically insignificant disease. It also provides valuable information regarding tumor characteristics such as location and extraprostatic extension to guide surgical planning. Information from mpMRI may also help patients avoid unnecessary biopsies in the future. It can also be incorporated into targeted biopsies as well as following patients on active surveillance. Other novel techniques have also been developed to detect metastatic disease with advantages over traditional computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, which primarily rely on defined size criteria. These new techniques take advantage of underlying biological changes in prostate cancer tissue to identify metastatic disease. The purpose of this review is to present literature on imaging as a personalized biomarker for prostate cancer risk stratification.

Keywords: Gleason score; active surveillance; cancer staging; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); radiation therapy; radical prostatectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.J.G. and S.R.-B. have received research funding from Blue Earth Diagnostics. S.R.-B. has received consulting fees from Philips/InVivo Corp. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2001;69:89–95. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2001.113989. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heidenreich A., Bastian P.J., Bellmunt J., Bolla M., Joniau S., van der Kwast T., Mason M., Matveev V., Wiegel T., Zattoni F., et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur. Urol. 2014;65:124–137. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016;66:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhindi B., Mamdani M., Kulkarni G.S., Finelli A., Hamilton R.J., Trachtenberg J., Zlotta A.R., Evans A., van der Kwast T.H., Toi A., et al. Impact of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against prostate specific antigen screening on prostate biopsy and cancer detection rates. J. Urol. 2015;193:1519–1524. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.11.096. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siddiqui M.M., Rais-Bahrami S., Turkbey B., George A.K., Rothwax J., Shakir N., Okoro C., Raskolnikov D., Parnes H.L., Linehan W.M., et al. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA. 2015;313:390–397. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17942. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources