Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 2;15(12):2717.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122717.

A Systematic Review of the Basis for WHO's New Recommendation for Limiting Aircraft Noise Annoyance

Truls Gjestland  1
Affiliations

A Systematic Review of the Basis for WHO's New Recommendation for Limiting Aircraft Noise Annoyance

Truls Gjestland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The new WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region have recommendations for limiting noise exposure associated with adverse health effects. The limits are said to be based on a systematic review of existing evidence. This paper gives a systematic assessment of the presented evidence with respect to annoyance from aircraft noise. The new guidelines have been based on the results from a selection of existing aircraft noise studies. This paper demonstrates that a similar selection of other existing post-2000 studies will yield very different results. In addition, the validity of the presented evidence has been questioned as some of the referenced studies have not been conducted according to standardized methods, and the selection of respondents is not representative of the general airport population.

Keywords: WHO guidelines; aircraft noise; annoyance; dose–response; environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scatterplot of the response data from the 12 studies included in the WHO full dataset. The size of the markers corresponds to the number of respondents in the respective study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dose–response curve for the WHO full dataset presented by Guski et al. compared with the corresponding CTL curve and the EU reference curve (Miedema & Vos) for aircraft noise annoyance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dose–response curve for 18 post-2000 surveys compared with the EU reference curve (Miedema & Vos) for aircraft noise annoyance.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. World Health Organization . Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region. WHO Regional Office for Europe; Copenhagen, Denmark: 2018.
    1. Guski R., Schreckenberg D., Schuemer R. WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region. A systematic review on environmental noise and annoyance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2017 doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121539. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miedema H.M., Vos H. Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998;104:3432–3445. doi: 10.1121/1.423927. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Babisch W., Houthuijs D., Cadum E., Katsouyanni K., Velonakis M., Dudley M.L., Swart W., Breugelmans O., Bluhm G., Selander J., et al. Annoyance due to aircraft noise has increased over the years—Results of the HYENA study. Environ. Int. 2009;35:1169–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.07.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breugelmans O.R.P., van Wiechen C.M.A.G., van Kamp I., Heisterkamp S.H., Houthuijs D.J.M. Tussenrapportage Monitoring Gezondheitskundige Evaluatie Schiphol. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheit en Milieu; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2005. Report 630100001.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources