Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Dec 4;8(1):17604.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36006-x.

Association Between ABO Blood Groups and Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Association Between ABO Blood Groups and Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Meta-Analysis

Zakaria Chakrani et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

There is no consensus among the existing literature on the relationship between ABO blood groups and risk of Helicobacter pylori infection. However, histo-blood group carbohydrates are proposed to influence the risk of acquiring this pathogen via effects on adhesion to the gastric mucosa. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between ABO blood groups and H. pylori infection. All relevant epidemiological studies published in English (up to October 2017) was retrieved through an extensive systematic literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed databases. Pooled estimates of effects were obtained through the use of fixed and random effects meta-analyses. Individuals with O blood group were more likely to be infected with H. pylori (pooled odds ratio (OR) 1.163; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.074-1.259; P < 0.001). While individuals with B and AB blood group were less likely to be infected with H. pylori (OR 0.831; 95% CI 0.738-0.935; P = 0.002 and OR 0.709; 95% CI 0.605-0.832; P < 0.001, respectively). The results from this meta-analysis of observational studies suggest an estimated 16.3% increased odds of H. pylori infection amongst individuals with the O blood group. If this observed association is causal, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms could provide indications to potential prevention strategies for H. pylori infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Meta-analysis of the association between O blood group and H. pylori infection. For each study, the box represents the fixed and random effects odds ratio and the line the 95% confidence intervals. The size of each box indicates the relative weight of each study in the meta-analysis. Test for overall fixed and random effects: z = 3.731, P < 0.001, I2 = 85.52, P < 0.001; z = 1.818, P = 0.069, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Funnel plot of standard error by log odds ration for the association between O blood group and H. pylori infection. Egger’s test; b = 0.80198, P = 0.48672.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Meta-analysis of the association between B blood group and H. pylori infection. Test for overall fixed and random effects: z = −3.073, P = 0.002, I2 = 62.31, P < 0.001; z = −1.858, P = 0.063, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Funnel plot of standard error by log odds ration for the association between B blood group and H. pylori infection. Egger’s test; b = −0.221, P = 0.79117.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Meta-analysis of the association between AB blood group and H. pylori infection. Test for overall fixed and random effects: z = −4.235, P < 0.001, I2 = 49.27, P = 0.002; z = −2.027, P = 0.043, respectively.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Funnel plot of standard error by log odds ration for the association between AB blood group and H. pylori infection. Egger’s test; b = 0.77514, P = 0.17212.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Meta-analysis of the association between A blood group and H. pylori infection. Test for overall fixed and random effects: z = 0.953, P = 0.340, I2 = 74.68, P < 0.001; z = −0.213, P = 0.831, respectively.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Meta-analysis of the association between Rh blood group and H. pylori infection. Test for overall fixed effects and random effects: z = −1.583, P = 0.113, I2 = 31.999, P = 0.184; z = −1.306, P = 0.192, respectively.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Meta-analysis of the association between secretor status and H. pylori infection. Test for overall fixed and random effects: z = 1.067, P = 0.286, z = 1.001, P = 0.317, respectively. I2 = 18.157, P = 0.184.

References

    1. Megraud F, Brassens-Rabbe MP, Denis F, Belbouri A, Hoa DQ. Seroepidemiology of Campylobacter pylori infection in various populations. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27(8):1870–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Go MF. Review article: natural history and epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2002;16(Suppl 1):3–15. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.0160s1003.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ernst PB, Gold BD. The disease spectrum of Helicobacter pylori: the immunopathogenesis of gastroduodenal ulcer and gastric cancer. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2000;54:615–40. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.615. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uemura N, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(11):784–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa001999. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schistosomes, liver flukes and Helicobacter pylori. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, 7–14 June 1994. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. 61, 1–241 (1994). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances