Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 1:2018:5924058.
doi: 10.1155/2018/5924058. eCollection 2018.

Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty

Affiliations

Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty

Konstantinos Droutsas et al. J Ophthalmol. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the impact of graft thickness (GT) on postoperative visual acuity and endothelial cell density after ultrathin-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus conventional DSAEK.

Methods: The medical records of all patients who underwent DSAEK at our institute during a 2-year period were reviewed. After excluding subjects with low visual potential, 34 eyes were divided into two groups based on the postoperative GT as measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT): an UT-DSAEK group (GT ≤ 100 μm, n=13 eyes) and a DSAEK group (GT > 100 μm, n=21 eyes). The groups were compared with regard to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), GT, and endothelial cell density (ECD).

Results: Preoperative BCVA (logMAR) was 1.035 ± 0.514 and 0.772 ± 0.428 for UT-DSAEK and DSAEK, respectively (P=0.072). At 6 months postoperatively, BCVA was 0.088 ± 0.150 following UT-DSAEK and 0.285 ± 0.158 following DSAEK (P=0.001).

Conclusion: DSAEK grafts with a thickness under 100 μm offered better visual outcomes during the early postoperative period.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Thickness of a DSAEK graft as measured on an AS-OCT image. Both total (a) and graft (b) corneal thickness were measured at 5 points (at the point of intersection of the measurement's reference axis and the graft and at 1 mm distance in the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal meridian). Here are depicted three horizontal points: at the point of intersection of the measurement's reference axis and the graft, and at 1 mm distance on both sides nasally and temporally to the centre.

References

    1. Price M. O., Price F. W., Jr. Endothelial keratoplasty—a review. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. 2010;38(2):128–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02213.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Terry M. A., Shamie N., Chen E. S., Hoar K. L., Friend D. J. Endothelial keratoplasty a simplified technique to minimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure, and pupillary block. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(7):1179–1186. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.09.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen E. S., Terry M. A., Shamie N., Hoar K. L., Friend D. J. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2008;27(5):514–520. doi: 10.1097/ico.0b013e3181611c50. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turnbull A. M. J., Tsatsos M., Hossain P. N., Anderson D. F. Determinants of visual quality after endothelial keratoplasty. Survey of Ophthalmology. 2016;61(3):257–271. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.12.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Busin M., Madi S., Santorum P., Scorcia V., Beltz J. Ultrathin descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(6):1186–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.030. - DOI - PubMed