Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 9;5(5):461-470.
doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12672. eCollection 2018 Sep-Oct.

Understanding, Impact, and Communication of "Off" Periods in Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review

Tara Rastgardani  1 , Melissa J Armstrong  2 , Anna R Gagliardi  3 , Connie Marras  1
Affiliations

Understanding, Impact, and Communication of "Off" Periods in Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review

Tara Rastgardani et al. Mov Disord Clin Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Off periods are a common and disabling symptom of Parkinson's disease. We reviewed published research on understanding, impact, and communication regarding off periods to identify issues warranting further research.

Methods: We performed a scoping review, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from 2006 to January 2018 for studies examining the impact of, understanding of, or communication about off periods.

Results: Twenty-six papers met eligibility criteria. Twenty-three studies evaluated the impact or experience of off periods in patients, three evaluated the impact upon carepartners, two papers addressed understanding of off periods, one study evaluated communication about off periods, and three studies evaluated a facilitator of communication about off periods. The findings indicate that (1) off periods are among the most troublesome symptoms to patients and that their impact on activities is broad; (2) the understanding of off periods by patients, carepartners, and nurses may be suboptimal; and (3) questionnaires hold promise as a mechanism for facilitating communication given the findings that they may enhance the detection of off periods and are rated as useful by physicians. No studies evaluated interventions to promote knowledge about off periods, and no studies identified barriers of communication about off periods.

Conclusions: There is a paucity of knowledge regarding the lived experiences of off periods, particularly for carepartners. Additionally, little knowledge exists in the literature regarding understanding of and communication about off periods between patients or carepartners and treating physicians. Further research is required to explore these issues to ultimately improve the treatment of off periods.

Keywords: Parkinson's disease; communication; impact; motor fluctuations; “off” periods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram indicating number of papers included at each stage of review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Stacy M, Hauser R, Oertel W, et al. End‐of‐dose wearing off in Parkinson disease: a 9‐question survey assessment. Clin Neuropharmacol 2006;29:312–321. - PubMed
    1. Stacy M, Bowron A, Guttman M, et al. Identification of motor and nonmotor wearing‐off in Parkinson's disease: comparison of a patient questionnaire versus a clinician assessment. Mov Disord 2005;20:726–733. - PubMed
    1. Sethi KD. The impact of levodopa on quality of life in patients with Parkinson disease. Neurology 2010;16:76–83. - PubMed
    1. Chou KL, Stacy M, Simuni T, et al. The spectrum of “off” in Parkinson's disease: what have we learned over 40 years? Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2018;51:9–16. - PubMed
    1. Ahlskog JE, Muenter MD. Frequency of levodopa‐related dyskinesias and motor fluctuations as estimated from the cumulative literature. Mov Disord 2001;16:448–458. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources