Short-Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score is associated with falls in older outpatients
- PMID: 30515724
- DOI: 10.1007/s40520-018-1082-y
Short-Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score is associated with falls in older outpatients
Abstract
Background: The capacity of Short-Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) test to discriminate between fallers and non-fallers is controversial, and has never been compared with fall risk assessment-specific tools, such as Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA).
Aim: To verify the association of SPPB and POMA scores with falls in older outpatients.
Methods: 451 older subjects (150 males, mean age 82.1 ± 6.8) evaluated in a geriatric outpatient clinic for suspected frailty were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Self-reported history of falls and medication history were carefully assessed. Each participant underwent comprehensive geriatric assessment, including SPPB, POMA, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and mini-nutritional assessment-short form (MNA-SF). Multivariate logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with the status of faller.
Results: 245 (54.3%) subjects were identified as fallers. They were older and had lower SPPB and POMA test scores than non-fallers. At ROC analysis, SPPB (AUC 0.676, 95% CI 0.627-0.728, p < 0.001) and POMA (AUC 0.677, 95% CI 0.627-0.726, p < 0.001) scores were both associated with falls. At multivariate logistic regression models, SPPB total score (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.92, p < 0.001), POMA total score (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.98, p = 0.002) and SPPB balance score alteration (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.42-5.85, p = 0.004), but not POMA balance subscale score alteration, were independently associated with recorded falls, as also GDS, MMSE and MNA-SF scores.
Conclusions: SPPB total score was independently associated with reported falls in older outpatients, resulting non-inferior to POMA scale. The use of SPPB for fall risk assessment should be implemented.
Keywords: Balance; Comprehensive geriatric assessment; Falls; Frailty.
References
-
- Blain H, Masud T, Dargent-Molina P et al (2016) A comprehensive fracture prevention strategy in older adults: the European union geriatric medicine society (EUGMS). Statement J Nutr Health Aging 20:647–652 - DOI
-
- Tinetti ME (2003) Clinical practice. Preventing falls in elderly persons. N Engl J Med 348:42–49 - DOI
-
- Gill TM, Murphy TE, Gahbauer EA et al (2013) Association of injurious falls with disability outcomes and nursing home admissions in community-living older persons. Am J Epidemiol 178:418–425 - DOI
-
- Tricco AC, Thomas SM, Veroniki AA et al (2017) Comparisons of interventions for preventing falls in older adults. A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 318:1687–1699 - DOI
-
- Park SH (2018) Tools for assessing fall risk in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res 30:1–16 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical