Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0204796.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204796. eCollection 2018.

Base composition is the primary factor responsible for the variation of amino acid usage in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata)

Affiliations

Base composition is the primary factor responsible for the variation of amino acid usage in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata)

Yousheng Rao et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

In the present study, we carried out an examination of the amino acid usage in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) proteome. We found that tRNA abundance, base composition, hydrophobicity and aromaticity, protein second structure, cysteine residue (Cys) content and protein molecular weight had significant impact on the amino acid usage of the zebra finch. The above factors explained the total variability of 22.85%, 25.37%, 10.91%, 5.06%, 4.21%, and 3.14%, respectively. Altogether, approximately 70% of the total variability in zebra finch could be explained by such factors. Comparison of the amino acid usage between zebra finch, chicken (Gallus gallus) and human (Homo sapiens) suggested that the average frequency of various amino acid usage is generally consistent among them. Correspondence analysis indicated that base composition was the primary factor affecting the amino acid usage in zebra finch. This trend was different from chicken, but similar to human. Other factors affecting the amino acid usage in zebra finch, such as isochore structure, protein second structure, Cys frequency and protein molecular weight also showed the similar trends with human. We do not know whether the similar amino acid usage trend between human and zebra finch is related to the distinctive neural and behavioral traits, but it is worth studying in depth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Relationship between the relative amino acid usage and the isoaccepting tRNA gene copy number.
The tRNA gene copy numbers for each codon in the Taeniopygia guttata genome was taken from http://gtrnadb.ucsc.edu/GtRNAdb2/genomes/eukaryota/Tgutt2/ (August 2, 2017). The isoaccepting tRNA gene number was summed for each amino acid. The relative amino acid usage (RAAU) for each amino acid was calculated by CodonW 1.4.2. The average RAAU values of amino acid was correlated with the isoaccepting tRNA gene copy numbers significantly (r = 0.478, p = 0.038).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Distribution of the amino acids and genes on the first two axes of the correspondence analysis.
a. Representation of the first two axes of the correspondence analysis performed on the amino acid frequency of Taeniopygia guttata protein. b. Representation of the first two axes of the correspondence analysis performed on the amino acid frequencies of 8109 Taeniopygia guttata genes. Membrane proteins are indicated by red dots. The total number of membrane proteins was 298. The percentage of membrane proteins with the positive value account for 72%.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Relationship between GC content and axis 1,axis 2.
a. Axis 1 positively correlated with GCcds significantly. b. Axis 1 strongly correlated with GC2 positively. c. Axis 1 weakly correlated with GC3 positively. d. Axis 2 negatively correlated with GCcds significantly. e. Axis 2 negatively correlated with GC1 significantly. f. Axis 2 negatively correlated with GC2 significantly.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Relationship between axis 2 and the GRAVY score of proteins, the Aromo score of proteins.
a. Axis 2 strongly correlated with the GRAVY score of proteins. b. Axis 2 strongly correlated with the Aromo score of proteins.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Comparison of the average frequency of various amino acids usage among zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), chicken (Gallus gallus) and human (Homo sapiens).

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Molecular Spatiomics by Proximity Labeling.
    Kang MG, Rhee HW. Kang MG, et al. Acc Chem Res. 2022 May 17;55(10):1411-1422. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00061. Epub 2022 May 5. Acc Chem Res. 2022. PMID: 35512328 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Knight RD, Freeland SJ and Landweber LF (2001) A simple model based on mutation and selection explains trends in codon and amino-acid usage and GC composition within and across genomes. Genome Biol., 2 (4): RESEARCH0010. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rispe C, Delmotte F, van Ham RC and Moya A (2004) Mutational and selective pressures on codon and amino acid usage in Buchnera, endosymbiotic bacteria of aphids. Genome Res. 14(1): 44–53. 10.1101/gr.1358104 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rao YS, Wang ZF, Chai XW, Nie QH and Zhang XQ (2014) Hydrophobicity and aromaticity are primary factors shaping variation in amino acid usage of chicken proteome. PLoS One 9(10):e110381 10.1371/journal.pone.0110381 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Palacios C and Wernegreen J J (2002) A strong effect of AT mutational bias on amino acid usage in Buchnera is mitigated at high-expression genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19(9): 1575–84. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004219 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lightfield J, Fram NR and Ely B (2011) Across bacterial phyla, distantly-related genomes with similar genomic GC content have similar patterns of amino acid usage. PLoS One 6(3): e17677 10.1371/journal.pone.0017677 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types