Influence of reward learning on visual attention and eye movements in a naturalistic environment: A virtual reality study
- PMID: 30517170
- PMCID: PMC6281232
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207990
Influence of reward learning on visual attention and eye movements in a naturalistic environment: A virtual reality study
Abstract
Rewards constitute crucial signals that motivate approach behavior and facilitate the perceptual processing of objects associated with favorable outcomes in past encounters. Reward-related influences on perception and attention have been reliably observed in studies where a reward is paired with a unidimensional low-level visual feature, such as the color or orientation of a line in visual search tasks. However, our environment is drastically different and composed of multidimensional and changing visual features, encountered in complex and dynamic scenes. Here, we designed an immersive virtual reality (VR) experiment using a 4-frame CAVE system to investigate the impact of rewards on attentional orienting and gaze patterns in a naturalistic and ecological environment. Forty-one healthy participants explored a virtual forest and responded to targets appearing on either the left or right side of their path. To test for reward-induced biases in spatial orienting, targets on one side were associated with high reward, whereas those on the opposite side were paired with a low reward. Eye-movements recording showed that left-side high rewards led to subsequent increase of eye gaze fixations towards this side of the path, but no such asymmetry was found after exposure to right-sided high rewards. A milder spatial bias was also observed after left-side high rewards during subsequent exploration of a virtual castle yard, but not during route turn choices along the forest path. Our results indicate that reward-related influences on attention and behavior may be better learned in left than right space, in line with a right hemisphere dominance, and could generalize to another environment to some extent, but not to spatial choices in another decision task, suggesting some domain- or context-specificity. This proof-of-concept study also outlines the advantages and the possible drawbacks of the use of the 3D CAVE immersive platform for VR in neuroscience.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Visuo-spatial orienting during active exploratory behavior: Processing of task-related and stimulus-related signals.Cortex. 2018 May;102:26-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.032. Epub 2017 Sep 5. Cortex. 2018. PMID: 28942896
-
The left hemisphere learns what is right: Hemispatial reward learning depends on reinforcement learning processes in the contralateral hemisphere.Neuropsychologia. 2016 Aug;89:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.05.023. Epub 2016 May 21. Neuropsychologia. 2016. PMID: 27221149
-
Value-driven attentional capture in neglect.Cortex. 2018 Dec;109:260-271. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Oct 5. Cortex. 2018. PMID: 30391880
-
Rewards teach visual selective attention.Vision Res. 2013 Jun 7;85:58-72. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.12.005. Epub 2012 Dec 19. Vision Res. 2013. PMID: 23262054 Review.
-
Orienting of attention and spatial cognition.Cogn Process. 2024 Aug;25(Suppl 1):55-59. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01216-x. Epub 2024 Aug 10. Cogn Process. 2024. PMID: 39123061 Review.
Cited by
-
The past, present, and future of selection history.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Nov;130:326-350. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 6. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021. PMID: 34499927 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Attention biases the process of risky decision-making: Evidence from eye-tracking.Psych J. 2024 Apr;13(2):157-165. doi: 10.1002/pchj.724. Epub 2023 Dec 28. Psych J. 2024. PMID: 38155408 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pavlovian learning in the selection history-dependent control of overt spatial attention.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Aug;48(8):783-789. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001030. Epub 2022 Jun 23. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022. PMID: 35737541 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Berridge KC, Robinson TE. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998;28(3):309–69. . - PubMed
-
- Bijleveld E, Custers R, Aarts H. Unconscious reward cues increase invested effort, but do not change speed-accuracy tradeoffs. Cognition. 2010;115(2):330–5. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.012 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Anderson BA, Laurent PA, Yantis S. Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27926 Epub 2011/12/02. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027926 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bourgeois A, Chelazzi L, Vuilleumier P. How motivation and reward learning modulate selective attention. Progress in Brain Research. 2016;229:325–42. 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.06.004 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Anderson BA, Laurent PA, Yantis S. Value-driven attentional capture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(25):10367–71. Epub 2011/06/08. 10.1073/pnas.1104047108 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous