Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jan;62(1):59-68.
doi: 10.1002/ajim.22928. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

Efficiency of autocoding programs for converting job descriptors into standard occupational classification (SOC) codes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Efficiency of autocoding programs for converting job descriptors into standard occupational classification (SOC) codes

Skye Buckner-Petty et al. Am J Ind Med. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Existing datasets often lack job exposure data. Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes can link work exposure data to health outcomes via a Job Exposure Matrix, but manually assigning SOC codes is laborious. We explored the utility of two SOC autocoding programs.

Methods: We entered industry and occupation descriptions from two existing cohorts into two publicly available SOC autocoding programs. SOC codes were also assigned manually by experienced coders. These SOC codes were then linked to exposures from the Occupational Information Network (O*NET).

Results: Agreement between the SOC codes produced by autocoding programs and those produced manually was modest at the 6-digit level, and strong at the 2-digit level. Importantly, O*NET exposure values based on SOC code assignment showed strong agreement between manual and autocoded methods.

Conclusion: Both available autocoding programs can be useful tools for assigning SOC codes, allowing linkage of occupational exposures to data containing free-text occupation descriptors.

Keywords: NIOCCS; O*NET; SOCcer; industry and occupation coding; job exposure matrix.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Agreement Between Autocoded and Manually Coded SOC Codes Based on Minimum Allowed Confidence Scores From Pooled Upper Extremity Study (Cohort 1), United States, 2001 – 2010, and From the Show-ME Study (Cohort 2), Missouri, 2012 – 2013 NIOCCS (NIOSH Industry and Occupation Computerized Coding System); SOC (Standard Occupational Classification); SOCcer (Standardized Occupation Coding for Computer-assisted Epidemiological Research) a SOCcer scores range from 0–1 b NIOCCS scores range from 90–100 (SOC codes with scores less than 90 are omitted by the program) c SOCcer and NIOCCS scores are aligned based on the proportion of the cohort that is autocoded at each minimum threshold Industry codes and occupation text included for both autocoding programs

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Average hours per day spent in selected activities on days worked by employment status and sex, 2017 annual averages. In. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2017.
    1. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Standard Occupational Classification. 2018; https://www.bls.gov/soc/.
    1. Dale AM, Ekenga CC, Buckner-Petty S, et al. Incident CTS in a large pooled cohort study: associations obtained by a Job Exposure Matrix versus associations obtained from observed exposures. Occup Environ Med. 2018;75(7):501–506. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mediouni Z, Bodin J, Dale AM, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome and computer exposure at work in two large complementary cohorts. BMJ open. 2015;5(9):e008156. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solovieva S, Pehkonen I, Kausto J, et al. Development and validation of a job exposure matrix for physical risk factors in low back pain. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48680. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types