Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 1;125(7):1091-1100.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.31885. Epub 2018 Dec 6.

Validation of the 2017 European LeukemiaNet classification for acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 and FLT3-internal tandem duplication genotypes

Affiliations

Validation of the 2017 European LeukemiaNet classification for acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 and FLT3-internal tandem duplication genotypes

Prajwal C Boddu et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The revised 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) classification (ELN-2017) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) divides patients into 3 prognostic risk categories, with additional factors such as the fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)-internal tandem duplication (ITD) allele ratio (AR) considered for risk stratification. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the prognostic usefulness of ELN-2017 in comparison with ELN-2010 in younger patients with AML has not been validated to date.

Methods: The authors performed a retrospective study on patients aged <60 years who received idarubicin plus cytarabine (IA)-based induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML.

Results: According to ELN-2017 criteria, the number of patients in the favorable (Fav), intermediate (Int), and adverse (Adv) risk categories was 192 patients (27%), 331 patients (46%), and 192 patients (27%), respectively. Overall survival probabilities at 5 years in the Fav, Int, and Adv groups were 57%, 37%, and 18%, respectively. In comparison, the 5-year overall survival probabilities in the Fav (169 patients), intermediate (IR)-1 (80 patients), IR-2 (306 patients), and Adv (160 patients) ELN-2010 categories were 59%, 32%, 40%, and 14%, respectively. Although ELN-2010 historically distinguishes prognosis into IR-1 and IR-2 categories in younger patients, this difference was nullified in the current study cohort. When comparing patients with a low FLT3-ITD AR with those with a high FLT3-ITD AR, no significant differences in survival were noted among patients with nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1)-mutated AML (P = .28) or wild-type NPM1 (P = .35), and in those treated with IA alone (P = .79) or those treated with IA and a FLT3 inhibitor (P = .10).

Conclusions: The ELN-2017 more accurately distinguishes prognosis in patients with newly diagnosed AML. The lack of prognostic significance for the FLT3-ITD AR needs further evaluation in different treatment settings.

Keywords: European LeukemiaNet; acute myeloid leukemia; allele ratio; prognosis; validation; younger.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES

The authors made no disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Changes in the risk categories between the 2010 European LeukemiaNet (ELN-2010) classification system and the ELN-2017 classification system with the ELN-2017 system.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overall survival according to the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN-2017) classification system and ELN-2010 risk categories (A) overall, irrespective of transplantation status and (B) when censoring for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Overall survival according to 2010 European LeukemiaNet (ELN-2010) classification subgroups within the ELN-2017 favorable risk category (Fav). IR-2 indicates intermediate II risk.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Overall survival according to 2010 European LeukemiaNet (ELN-2010) classification subgroups within the ELN-2017 intermediate risk category (A) overall, irrespective of transplantation status and (B) when censoring for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. IR-1 indicates intermediate I risk; IR-2, intermediate II risk.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Overall survival according to 2010 European LeukemiaNet (ELN-2010) classification subgroups within the ELN-2017 adverse risk category (Adv). IR-1 indicates intermediate I risk.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Overall survival according to the nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) and fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) genotypes as per the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN-2017) classification system. FLT3high indicates high FLT3 high allele ratio; FLT3low, low FLT3 allele ratio; mNPM1, NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia; wtNPM1, wild-type NPM1.

References

    1. Estey E, Dohner H. Acute myeloid leukaemia. Lancet. 2006;368:1894–1907. - PubMed
    1. Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children’s Leukaemia Working Parties. Blood. 1998;92:2322–2333. - PubMed
    1. Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV, et al.; National Cancer Research Institute Adult Leukaemia Working Group. Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. Blood. 2010;116:354–365. - PubMed
    1. Byrd JC, Mrozek K, Dodge RK, et al.; Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461). Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461). Blood. 2002;100:4325–4336. - PubMed
    1. Dohner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, et al.; European LeukemiaNet. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2010;115:453–474. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms