Integrated Aedes management for the control of Aedes-borne diseases
- PMID: 30521524
- PMCID: PMC6283470
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006845
Integrated Aedes management for the control of Aedes-borne diseases
Erratum in
-
Correction: Integrated Aedes management for the control of Aedes-borne diseases.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Mar 22;16(3):e0010310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010310. eCollection 2022 Mar. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022. PMID: 35316268 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: Diseases caused by Aedes-borne viruses, such as dengue, Zika, chikungunya, and yellow fever, are emerging and reemerging globally. The causes are multifactorial and include global trade, international travel, urbanisation, water storage practices, lack of resources for intervention, and an inadequate evidence base for the public health impact of Aedes control tools. National authorities need comprehensive evidence-based guidance on how and when to implement Aedes control measures tailored to local entomological and epidemiological conditions.
Methods and findings: This review is one of a series being conducted by the Worldwide Insecticide resistance Network (WIN). It describes a framework for implementing Integrated Aedes Management (IAM) to improve control of diseases caused by Aedes-borne viruses based on available evidence. IAM consists of a portfolio of operational actions and priorities for the control of Aedes-borne viruses that are tailored to different epidemiological and entomological risk scenarios. The framework has 4 activity pillars: (i) integrated vector and disease surveillance, (ii) vector control, (iii) community mobilisation, and (iv) intra- and intersectoral collaboration as well as 4 supporting activities: (i) capacity building, (ii) research, (iii) advocacy, and (iv) policies and laws.
Conclusions: IAM supports implementation of the World Health Organisation Global Vector Control Response (WHO GVCR) and provides a comprehensive framework for health authorities to devise and deliver sustainable, effective, integrated, community-based, locally adapted vector control strategies in order to reduce the burden of Aedes-transmitted arboviruses. The success of IAM requires strong commitment and leadership from governments to maintain proactive disease prevention programs and preparedness for rapid responses to outbreaks.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures

References
-
- Wilder-Smith A, Gubler DJ, Weaver SC, Monath TP, Heymann DL, Scott TW. Epidemic arboviral diseases: priorities for research and public health. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017; 17(3): e101–e106. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30518-7 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mayer SV, Tesh RB, Vasilakis N. The emergence of arthropod-borne viral diseases: A global prospective on dengue, chikungunya and zika fevers. Acta Trop. 2017; 166: 155–163. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.11.020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Horstick O, Runge-Ranzinger S, Nathan MB, Kroeger A. Dengue vector-control services: how do they work? A systematic literature review and country case studies. T Roy Soc Trop Med H. 2010; 104 (6): 379–386. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.07.027 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gubler DJ. Dengue, Urbanization and Globalization: The Unholy Trinity of the 21st Century. Trop Med Health. 2011; 39 (4): 3–11. 10.2149/tmh.2011-S05 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lindsay SW, Wilson A, Golding N, Scott TW, Takken W. Improving the built environment in urban areas to control Aedes aegypti-borne diseases. Bull World Health Organ. 2017; 95(8): 607–608. 10.2471/BLT.16.189688 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous