Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Dec 8;47(12):910-914.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2018.12.003.

[Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene T790M mutation by droplet digital PCR and Super-ARMS PCR in plasma ctDNA samples of non-small cell lung cancer patients with the resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

[Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene T790M mutation by droplet digital PCR and Super-ARMS PCR in plasma ctDNA samples of non-small cell lung cancer patients with the resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor]

[Article in Chinese]
Z Y Cao et al. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and Super-amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) in the detection of T790M mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in the plasma of non-small cell lung cancer patients who had developed resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) , and to investigate the clinical application of ddPCR. Methods: Plasma samples were collected from non-small cell lung cancer patients who had acquired EGFR-TKI resistance at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, from May 2017 to November 2017. Extracted ctDNA was analyzed by ddPCR and Super-ARMS to evaluate the T790M mutation status of EGFR gene. Results: A total of 37 patients with activating EGFR mutation that acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI were selected in the study, including 17 male and 20 female with a median age of 64 years (range 40-83 years). Before TKI treatment, all the patients harbored EGFR inhibitor sensitive mutations but without T790M mutation. After acquiring resistance to EGFR-TKI treatment, the T790M mutation rate detectable by ddPCR was 45.9% (17/37). In contrast, the mutation rate of T790M detectable by Super-ARMS was 35.1% (13/37, P<0.05). For the 13 positive cases detected by Super-ARMS (ΔCt<8), they were all positive by ddPCR assay; Among the 10 negative cases detected by Super-ARMS (ΔCt≥8), there were 3 cases positive by ddPCR assay. For patients without ΔCt by Super-ARMS assay, there was one weak positive case detectable by ddPCR assay. Among 17 EGFR T790M positive patients, 9 received EGFR inhibitor Osimertinib treatment, and 7 of them had good therapeutic response after the treatment. Conclusions: While a significant correlation between the two methods is shown. ddPCR is more sensitive than Super-ARMS in the detection of EGFR T790M mutation, indicating that it is a better method in guiding target drug therapy of non-small cell lung cancer patients after acquiring the resistance to EGFR-TKI.

目的: 比较微滴数字PCR(ddPCR)与Super-扩增阻滞突变系统(ARMS)法检测表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗后耐药非小细胞肺癌患者血浆中EGFR基因耐药位点T790M突变的差异,并探讨ddPCR的临床应用价值。 方法: 收集同济大学附属上海市肺科医院2017年5至11月间37例经EGFR-TKI治疗后耐药的非小细胞肺癌患者血浆标本;分别采用ddPCR和Super-ARMS法检测血浆标本中EGFR基因T790M突变情况。 结果: EGFR-TKI治疗耐药后非小细胞肺癌患者,男性17例,女性20例,年龄范围40~83岁,中位年龄64岁。治疗前,37例患者肿瘤组织均检测出EGFR基因敏感突变,无T790M突变。靶向治疗耐药后,ddPCR检测患者血浆游离DNA EGFR基因T790M突变,阳性率为45.9%(17/37),Super-ARMS检测阳性率为35.1%(13/37),统计学分析发现,两种方法检测EGFR T790M突变阳性率差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。13例Super-ARMS法T790M突变病例(ΔCt值<8),经ddPCR法检测均为阳性;Super-ARMS法10例翘尾病例(ΔCt值≥8,T790M突变阴性),ddPCR法检测显示有3例T790M突变;Super-ARMS法14例完全阴性病例(无ΔCt值,T790M突变阴性),ddPCR法检测显示有1例T790M突变弱阳性。ddPCR法检测T790M突变结果与Super-ARMS法检测判读的ΔCt值之间有显著相关性。在ddPCR检测出的17例T790M阳性的患者中,其中9例患者接受了奥西替尼治疗,7例患者都有良好的获益。 结论: ddPCR检测EGFR-TKI治疗耐药后非小细胞肺癌患者血浆EGFR基因T790M突变,比Super-ARMS法具有更高的灵敏度,这可能会在指导临床靶向药物治疗上具有广泛的应用价值。.

Keywords: Carcinoma, non-small-cell lung; Drug resistance, neoplasm; Liquid biopsy; Molecular targeted therapy; Polymerase chain reaction; Receptor, epidermal growth factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms