Racial/ethnic disparities in disease burden and costs related to exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the United States: an exploratory analysis
- PMID: 30529005
- PMCID: PMC6455970
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.024
Racial/ethnic disparities in disease burden and costs related to exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the United States: an exploratory analysis
Abstract
Objective: Studies have documented disparities in exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDC), but no studies have investigated potential implications for racial/ethnic disparities in chronic disease and associated costs. Our objective was to examine EDC levels in the US population according to race/ethnicity and to quantify disease burden and associated costs.
Study design and setting: EDC exposure levels in 2007-2010 were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. The associated disease burden and costs for 12 exposure-response relationships were determined for non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Blacks, Mexican Americans, Other Hispanics, and Other/Multicultural.
Results: EDC exposure levels and associated burden of disease and costs were higher in non-Hispanic Blacks ($56.8 billion; 16.5% of total costs) and Mexican Americans ($50.1 billion; 14.6%) compared with their proportion of the total population (12.6% and 13.5%, respectively). Associated costs among non-Hispanic whites comprised 52.3% of total costs ($179.8 billion) although they comprise 66.1% of the US population. These disparities are driven by generally higher exposure to persistent pesticides and flame retardants among non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans.
Conclusion: Our estimates suggest that racial/ethnic disparities in chronic diseases in the US may be because of chemical exposures and are an important tool to inform policies that address such disparities.
Keywords: Disease burden; Economic costs; Endocrine-disrupting chemicals; Neurodevelopment; Obesity; Reproductive health.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Bergman Å, et al., WHO (World Health Organization)/UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) 2013. The State-of-the-Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals – 2012. Geneva: UNEP/WHO; Available at http://www.who.int/ceh/publications/endocrine/en/ (accessed 14 December 2015). 2013.
-
- Attina TM, et al., Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the USA: a population-based disease burden and cost analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2016. 4(12): p. 996–1003. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
