Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2018 Dec 9;8(12):e021366.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021366.

Identifying cut-off scores for job demands and job control in nursing professionals: a cross-sectional survey in Germany

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Identifying cut-off scores for job demands and job control in nursing professionals: a cross-sectional survey in Germany

Sabrina Zeike et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Nurses are generally found to be vulnerable to burnout, but nurses working in cancer care are even more so, since this profession is characterised by continuous confrontation with suffering and death. This study was designed to identify cut-off scores for job strain, that is, low job control and high job demands, for a sample of nurses working in breast cancer care. The main goal was to find cut-off scores, which predict the risk of nurses of developing a mental disorder from high job strain.

Design: The design was a cross-sectional survey study.

Setting: The study is based on an employee survey in breast cancer centres in Germany.

Participants: 688 nurses received a questionnaire; 329 nurses from 33 hospitals participated in the survey (return rate: 50.2%).

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Dependent variable: psychological well-being, measured by the WHO-5 Well-being Index; independent variables: job control and job demands, measured by the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ).

Results: Multivariable analysis indicates that low job control and high job demands are prognostic factors for low well-being. In a receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis, the cut-off scores, which demonstrated a maximum Youden index, were 34.5 for job control and 31.4 for job demands. The combination of both scales from a logistic regression analysis resulted in an area under the curve of 0.778. Sensitivity and specificity are 70.3% and 74.2%, respectively. The total of correct classification was 63.3%.

Conclusion: The determined cut-off scores indicate that there is a risk of becoming psychologically ill from a high workload when an individual reaches a score of ≤34.5 for job control and ≥31.4 for job demands. The described method of establishing risk-based cut-off scores is promising for nursing practice and for the field of occupational health. Transferability and generalisability of the cut-off scores should be further analysed.

Keywords: Job-demand-control-model; cancer care; cut-off scores; nursing professionals; who-5 well-being index; work-related psychosocial risks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the selection of the nurses’ sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplots for the study scales psychological well-being (WHO-Five Well-being Index (WHO-5)), job control and job demands (n=329). JCQ, Job Content Questionnaire.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Classification in groups of job strain, according to Karasek; valid per cent (n); subjects below the crucial cut-off of 13 for well-being (WB) for each pattern, valid per cent (n). (B) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in which the true-positive rate is plotted against the false-positive rate for job control, job demands and the combination of both (analysis in the trainings set; n=215).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Oshio T, Inoue A, Tsutsumi A. Examining the mediating effect of work-to-family conflict on the associations between job stressors and employee psychological distress: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015608 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015608 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegrist J. Stress in the workplace. The New Blackwell Companion to Medical Sociology 2016:268 10.1002/9781444314786.ch12 - DOI
    1. Cottini E, Lucifora C. Mental health and working conditions in Europe. ILR Review 2013;66:958–88. 10.1177/001979391306600409 - DOI
    1. Luchman JN, González-Morales MG. Demands, control, and support: a meta-analytic review of work characteristics interrelationships. J Occup Health Psychol 2013;18:37–52. 10.1037/a0030541 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ganster DC, Rosen CC. Work stress and employee health: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management 2013;39:1085–122. 10.1177/0149206313475815 - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms