Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;24(3):338-344.
doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0290-3. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

Common-variant associations with fragile X syndrome

Affiliations

Common-variant associations with fragile X syndrome

James J Crowley et al. Mol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar.

Erratum in

  • Correction: Common-variant associations with fragile X syndrome.
    Crowley JJ, Szatkiewicz J, Kähler AK, Giusti-Rodriguez P, Ancalade N, Booker JK, Carr JL, Giamberardino SN, Crawford GE, Losh M, Stockmeier CA, Taylor AK, Piven J, Sullivan PF. Crowley JJ, et al. Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;25(12):3450. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0526-x. Mol Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 31548576

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome is rare but a prominent cause of intellectual disability. It is usually caused by a de novo mutation that occurs on multiple haplotypes and thus would not be expected to be detectible using genome-wide association (GWA). We conducted GWA in 89 male FXS cases and 266 male controls, and detected multiple genome-wide significant signals near FMR1 (odds ratio = 8.10, P = 2.5 × 10-10). These findings withstood robust attempts at falsification. Fine-mapping yielded a minimum P = 1.13 × 10-14, but did not narrow the interval. Comprehensive functional genomic integration did not provide a mechanistic hypothesis. Controls carrying a risk haplotype had significantly longer FMR1 CGG repeats than controls with the protective haplotype (P = 4.75 × 10-5), which may predispose toward increases in CGG number to the premutation range over many generations. This is a salutary reminder of the complexity of even "simple" monogenetic disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

PFS is a scientific advisor for Lundbeck.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. FXS case-control GWAS.
(A) Quantile-quantile plot for logistic regression of male FXS cases and GABC controls (including ancestry principle components). The observed P-values conform closely to the null except for five SNPs in the FMR1 region. The shaded region indicates the expected 95% probability interval for ordered P-values. (B) Manhattan plot for the GWAS of male FXS cases and GABC controls (logistic regression including ancestry principle components). The X-axis is chromosomal position from 1ptel to Xqtel. The Y-axis is -log10(P). Genome-wide significant SNPs near FMR1 are indicated. (C) Detail of FMR1 region (hg19, chrX:146850000–147040000). Tracks are: GENCODE gene annotations; positions of FRAXAC1, FRAXAC2, and promoter CGG repeat; selected ChIP-seq marks; SNP positions and -log10(P) for SNPs in the fine-mapping study and in the GWAS; DNA-DNA chromosomal looping from 5C based on the FMR1 promoter; and open chromatin in pre-frontal cortex of 9 adult schizophrenia (SCZ) cases and 9 fetal samples.

References

    1. Bhakar AL, Dolen G & Bear MF The pathophysiology of fragile X (and what it teaches us about synapses). Annu Rev Neurosci 35, 417–43 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turner G, Webb T, Wake S & Robinson H Prevalence of fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet 64, 196–7 (1996). - PubMed
    1. Sherman SL Epidemiology. in Fragile X Syndrome: Diagnosis, Treatment and Research (eds. Hagerman R & Hagerman P) 136–168 (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2002).
    1. Terracciano A, Chiurazzi P & Neri G Fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 137, 32–7 (2005). - PubMed
    1. Oberle I et al. Instability of a 550-base pair DNA segment and abnormal methylation in fragile X syndrome. Science 252, 1097–102 (1991). - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources