Robust forecast aggregation
- PMID: 30538197
- PMCID: PMC6310790
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1813934115
Robust forecast aggregation
Abstract
Bayesian experts who are exposed to different evidence often make contradictory probabilistic forecasts. An aggregator, ignorant of the underlying model, uses this to calculate his or her own forecast. We use the notions of scoring rules and regret to propose a natural way to evaluate an aggregation scheme. We focus on a binary state space and construct low regret aggregation schemes whenever there are only two experts that either are Blackwell-ordered or receive conditionally independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) signals. In contrast, if there are many experts with conditionally i.i.d. signals, then no scheme performs (asymptotically) better than a [Formula: see text] forecast.
Keywords: Blackwell-ordered information structure; conditionally independent information structure; information aggregation; one-shot regret minimization.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Brier GW. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Mon Weather Rev. 1950;78:1–3.
-
- Blackwell D. Equivalent comparisons of experiments. Ann Math Stat. 1953;24:265–272.
-
- Prelec D, Seung HS, McCoy J. A solution to the single-question crowd wisdom problem. Nature. 2017;541:532–535. - PubMed
-
- DeGroot MH. Reaching a consensus. J Am Stat Assoc. 1974;69:118–121.
-
- James SH, Watson MW. Combination forecasts of output growth in a seven-country data set. J Forecast. 1984;23:405–430.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
