Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 12;5(11):ofy292.
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy292. eCollection 2018 Nov.

Effectiveness of the Oral Human Attenuated Rotavirus Vaccine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis-2006-2016

Affiliations
Review

Effectiveness of the Oral Human Attenuated Rotavirus Vaccine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis-2006-2016

Corinne Willame et al. Open Forum Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Gastroenteritis caused by rotavirus accounts for considerable morbidity in young children. We aimed to assess the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the oral rotavirus vaccine Rotarix, as measured by laboratory-confirmed rotavirus infection after referral to hospital and/or emergency departments in children aged <5 years with gastroenteritis.

Methods: We performed a systematic search for peer-reviewed studies conducted in real-life settings published between 2006 and 2016 and a meta-analysis to calculate the overall Rotarix VE, which was further discriminated through stratified analyses.

Results: The overall VE estimate was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62% to 75%); stratified analyses revealed a non-negligible impact of factors such as study design and socioeconomic status. Depending on the control group, VE ranged from 63% (95% CI, 52% to 72%) to 81% (95% CI, 69% to 88%) for unmatched and matched rotavirus test-negative controls. VE varied with socioeconomic status: 81% (95% CI, 74% to 86%) in high-income countries, 54% (95% CI, 39% to 65%) in upper-middle-income countries, and 63% (95% CI, 50% to 72%) in lower-middle-income countries. Age, rotavirus strain, and disease severity were also shown to impact VE, but to a lesser extent.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis of real-world studies showed that Rotarix is effective in helping to prevent hospitalizations and/or emergency department visits due to rotavirus infection.

Keywords: Rotarix; effectiveness; meta-analysis; rotavirus; systematic literature review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Focus on the patient section.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
PRISMA flowchart.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Estimated pooled vaccine effectiveness for 2 doses of Rotarix against laboratory-confirmed rotavirus infection after hospital and/or emergency department visits. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HIC, high-income country; LIC, low-income country; LMIC, lower-middle-income country; NR, not reported; SES, socioeconomic status; UMIC, upper-middle-income country; VE, vaccine effectiveness.

References

    1. Tate JE, Patel MM, Steele AD, et al. . Global impact of rotavirus vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines 2010; 9:395–407. - PubMed
    1. Tate JE, Burton AH, Boschi-Pinto C, Parashar UD. Global, regional, and national estimates of rotavirus mortality in children <5 years of age, 2000–2013. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62(Suppl 2):S96–S105. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rotavirus vaccines. WHO position paper - January 2013. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2013; 88:49–64. - PubMed
    1. International Vaccine Access Center (IVAC), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. VIEW-hub global vaccine introduction and implementation. 2017 https://www.jhsph.edu/research/centers-and-institutes/ivac/resources/IVA.... Accessed 10 November 2017.
    1. Jonesteller CL, Burnett E, Yen C, Tate JE, Parashar UD. Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination: a systematic review of the first decade of global post-licensure data, 2006–2016. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65:840–50. - PubMed