Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;48(3):20180184.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180184. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

Re-exposure in cone beam CT of the dentomaxillofacial region: a retrospective study

Affiliations

Re-exposure in cone beam CT of the dentomaxillofacial region: a retrospective study

Yasamin Habibi et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Methods:: In a retrospective cohort study CBCT images of 4986 patients from the patient database from the Department of Oral Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany were included and the rate of re-exposures was counted. Patients were stratified into those who received a scan with the small field-of-view CBCT or the large field-of-view CBCT. The effect of patient-related parameters as age and gender was implicated. As a further device-specific parameter, the statistical analysis included whether the selection of the field of view due to the device type had a significant influence on the occurrence of re-exposures. Furthermore, the rescans were analyzed with regard to their causes.

Results:: In total, CBCT images of 82 (1.6%) patients had to be repeated. Looking at the two different devices, in 42 (1.3%) patients that received a scan with the large field-of-view CBCT and in 40 (2.3%) patients that received a scan with the small field-of-view CBCT respectively needed a retake. There was no statistically significant correlation between age and gender to retakes. For the small field-of-view-size significantly more retakes were observed than for the large one. With 46% motion artifacts were the most frequent causes for a re-exposure of the patient.

Conclusions:: Gender and age did not have an impact on the occurrence of re-exposures. Patients who received a scan with the small field-of-view CBCT were significantly more often rescanned than those with the large field-of-view CBCT.

Keywords: CBCT; large field-of-view CBCT; small field-of-view CBCT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Movement artifacts in CBCT.

References

    1. Scarfe WC , Farman AG . What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008. ; 52 : 707 – 30 . doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dannewitz B , Hassfeld S , Eickholz P , Mühling J . Effect of dose reduction in digital dental panoramic radiography on image quality . Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002. ; 31 : 50 – 5 . doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600651 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boeddinghaus R , Whyte A . Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging . Eur J Radiol 2008. ; 66 : 396 – 418 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dau M , Marciak P , Al-Nawas B , Staedt H , Alshiri A , Frerich B , et al. . Evaluation of symptomatic maxillary sinus pathologies using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography-influence of professional training . Int J Implant Dent 2017. ; 3 : 13 . doi: 10.1186/s40729-017-0075-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mozzo P , Procacci C , Tacconi A , Tinazzi Martini P , Bergamo Andreis IA , Martini PT , Andreis IA . A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results . European Radiology 1998. ; 8 : 1558 – 64 . doi: 10.1007/s003300050586 - DOI - PubMed