Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Feb 1;48(1):45-57.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy273.

Effect modification of FADS2 polymorphisms on the association between breastfeeding and intelligence: results from a collaborative meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect modification of FADS2 polymorphisms on the association between breastfeeding and intelligence: results from a collaborative meta-analysis

Fernando Pires Hartwig et al. Int J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Background: Accumulating evidence suggests that breastfeeding benefits children's intelligence, possibly due to long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFAs) present in breast milk. Under a nutritional adequacy hypothesis, an interaction between breastfeeding and genetic variants associated with endogenous LC-PUFAs synthesis might be expected. However, the literature on this topic is controversial.

Methods: We investigated this gene × environment interaction through a collaborative effort. The primary analysis involved >12 000 individuals and used ever breastfeeding, FADS2 polymorphisms rs174575 and rs1535 coded assuming a recessive effect of the G allele, and intelligence quotient (IQ) in Z scores.

Results: There was no strong evidence of interaction, with pooled covariate-adjusted interaction coefficients (i.e. difference between genetic groups of the difference in IQ Z scores comparing ever with never breastfed individuals) of 0.12[(95% confidence interval (CI): -0.19; 0.43] and 0.06 (95% CI: -0.16; 0.27) for the rs174575 and rs1535 variants, respectively. Secondary analyses corroborated these results. In studies with ≥5.85 and <5.85 months of breastfeeding duration, pooled estimates for the rs174575 variant were 0.50 (95% CI: -0.06; 1.06) and 0.14 (95% CI: -0.10; 0.38), respectively, and 0.27 (95% CI: -0.28; 0.82) and -0.01 (95% CI: -0.19; 0.16) for the rs1535 variant.

Conclusions: Our findings did not support an interaction between ever breastfeeding and FADS2 polymorphisms. However, subgroup analysis suggested that breastfeeding may supply LC-PUFAs requirements for cognitive development if breastfeeding lasts for some (currently unknown) time. Future studies in large individual-level datasets would allow properly powered subgroup analyses and further improve our understanding on the breastfeeding × FADS2 interaction.

Keywords: Breastfeeding; FADS2; effect modification; fatty acids; intelligence; meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Illustration of the nutritional adequacy hypothesis involving breastfeeding, LC-PUFAs levels and associated genotypes, and cognitive development. Left panel: the benefits of increasing LC-PUFAs on cognitive development are assumed to exist only until a given level of LC-PUFAs (marked by T). Further increasing LC-PUFAs above T brings no further cognitive benefits. Right panel: breastfeeding is assumed to provide LC-PUFA levels above T regardless of genetic predisposition to higher or lower endogenous synthesis of LC-PUFAs. Non-breastfed individuals are assumed to need such genetic load of higher endogenous synthesis to achieve T. LC-PUFAs: long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Forest plots of the G × E interaction coefficientsa from the fully-adjustedb primary analysis (FADS2 variants coded in recessive form, and breastfeeding categorized into ever x never breastfeeding) based on random effects meta-analysis. SKOT-I and SKOT-II were excluded from the analyses for the rs174575 polymorphism because the model did not fit (due to a combination of modest sample size, high prevalence of breastfeeding and assuming a recessive genetic effect of the rarest allele). 1982Pelotas, 1982 Pelotas Birth Cohort; ALSPAC, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children; COPSAC2010, Copenhagen Prospective Study on Asthma in Childhood 2010; DMHDS, Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study; GenerationR, Generation R Study; INMA, INfancia y Medio Ambiente [Environment and Childhood]; Raine, Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study; SKOT-I and II, Småbørn Kost Og Trivsel (I and II); SYS, Saguenay Youth Study. aThese coefficients can be interpreted as the mean difference in IQ Z scores comparing ever with never breastfed individuals among GG carriers minus the mean difference in IQ Z scores comparing ever with never breastfed individuals among carriers of other genotypes. bCovariates were sex, age (linear and quadratic terms), ancestry-informative principal components (if available), genotyping centre (if necessary), maternal education (linear and quadratic terms) and/or maternal cognition (linear and quadratic terms).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ. et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet 2016;387:475–90. - PubMed
    1. Horta BL, Loret de Mola C, Victora CG.. Breastfeeding and intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr 2015;104:14–19. - PubMed
    1. Walfisch A, Sermer C, Cressman A, Koren G.. Breast milk and cognitive development—the role of confounders: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003259. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ritchie SJ. Publication bias in a recent meta-analysis on breastfeeding and IQ. Acta Paediatr 2017;106:345. - PubMed
    1. Dewey KG, Cohen RJ, Brown KH, Rivera LL.. Effects of exclusive breastfeeding for four versus six months on maternal nutritional status and infant motor development: results of two randomized trials in Honduras. J Nutr 2001;131:262–67. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances