Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Sep 15;74(10):1612-1619.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly277.

Effect of Losartan and Fish Oil on Plasma IL-6 and Mobility in Older Persons. The ENRGISE Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Losartan and Fish Oil on Plasma IL-6 and Mobility in Older Persons. The ENRGISE Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Marco Pahor et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Low-grade chronic inflammation, characterized by elevations in plasma Interleukin-6 (IL-6), is an independent risk factor of impaired mobility in older persons. Angiotensin receptor blockers and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω-3) may reduce IL-6 and may potentially improve physical function. To assess the main effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan and ω-3 as fish oil on IL-6 and 400 m walking speed, we conducted the ENRGISE Pilot multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Methods: The ENRGISE Pilot enrolled participants between April 2016 and June 2017, who participated for 12 months. Participants were aged ≥70 years with mobility impairment, had IL-6 between 2.5 and 30 pg/mL, and were able to walk 400 m at baseline. Participants were randomized in three strata 2 × 2 factorial to: (i) losartan 50-100 mg/d or placebo (n = 43), (ii) fish oil 1,400-2,800 mg/d or placebo (n = 180), and (iii) with both (n = 66).

Results: Two hundred eighty-nine participants were randomized (mean age 78.3 years, 47.4% women, 17.0% black). There was no effect of losartan (difference of means = -0.065 ± 0.116 [SE], 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.293-0.163, p = .58) or fish oil (-0.020 ± 0.077, 95% CI: -0.171-0.132, p = .80) on the log of IL-6. Similarly, there was no effect of losartan (-0.025 ± 0.026, 95% CI: -0.076-0.026, p = .34) or fish oil (0.010 ± 0.017, 95% CI: -0.025-0.044, p = .58) on walking speed (m/s).

Conclusions: These results do not support the use of these interventions to prevent mobility loss in older adults at risk of disability with low-grade chronic inflammation.

Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02676466.

Keywords: Aging; Factorial design; Inflammation; Multicenter trial; Walking speed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Consort flow chart. Potential participants could be ineligible for more than one reason. *No self-reported difficulty walking ¼ mile or climbing steps, n = 1,183. *Current use of ACEI or ARB for those ineligible for both Losartan and Fish Oil trials, n = 623. *Currently taking omega-3/fish oil for those ineligible for both Losartan and Fish Oil trials, n = 344. *Usually use a walker to get around, n = 246. * Known/active inflammatory disease, n = 230. *Prior or current atrial fibrillation, for those ineligible for both Losartan and *Unable to walk one block, n = 204. *Current smoker, n = 185. *Currently receiving physical therapy for gait, balance, n = 123. *Use of potassium sparing diuretics for those ineligible for both Losartan and Fish Oil trials, n = 96. *Lives outside area/relocations, n = 86. *Neurologic conditions, impaired mobility, n = 75. *Allergy to fish, shell fish, and/or fish oil for those ineligible for both Losartan and Fish Oil trials, n = 70. *Acute Infection, n = 66. *>14 alcohol drinks/week, n = 53. *Severe pulmonary disease, n = 47. *Participation in another intervention study, n = 47. *Consumed more than two servings per week of fish in the past year for those ineligible for both Losartan and Fish Oil trials, n = 44. *Age <70, n = 41.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Change in IL-6 pg/mL over time. (A) Losartan (solid line) vs no losartan (dotted line). (B) Fish oil (solid line) vs no fish oil (dotted line). (C) Losartan + fish oil (solid line) vs placebo (dotted line).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Change in 400 m walk speed m/s over time. (A) Losartan (solid line) vs no losartan (dotted line). (B) Fish oil (solid line) vs no fish oil (dotted line). (C) Losartan + fish oil (solid line) vs placebo (dotted line).

References

    1. Shumway-Cook A, Patla A, Stewart A, Ferrucci L, Ciol MA, Guralnik JM. Environmental components of mobility disability in community-living older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:393–398. - PubMed
    1. Newman AB, Simonsick EM, Naydeck BL, et al. . Association of long-distance corridor walk performance with mortality, cardiovascular disease, mobility limitation, and disability. JAMA. 2006;295:2018–2026. doi:10.1001/jama.295.17.2018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hardy SE, Kang Y, Studenski SA, Degenholtz HB. Ability to walk ¼ mile predicts subsequent disability, mortality, and health care costs. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:130–135. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1543-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Penninx BW, Kritchevsky SB, Newman AB, et al. . Inflammatory markers and incident mobility limitation in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:1105–1113. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52308.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manini TM, Anton SD, Beavers DP, et al. ; ENRGISE Pilot study investigators. Enabling reduction of low-grade inflammation in seniors pilot study: concept, rationale, and design. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65:1961–1968. doi:10.1111/jgs.14965 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data