Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):346.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1554-4.

High density genetic maps of St. Augustinegrass and applications to comparative genomic analysis and QTL mapping for turf quality traits

Affiliations

High density genetic maps of St. Augustinegrass and applications to comparative genomic analysis and QTL mapping for turf quality traits

Xingwang Yu et al. BMC Plant Biol. .

Abstract

Background: St. Augustinegrass [Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walt.) Kuntze] is a warm-season, perennial turfgrass species well adapted for home lawns and commercial landscapes with economic and ecological value. However, a lack of genomic resources in St. Augustinegrass has hindered the full utilization of genetic variance for maximizing genetic gain and limited our understanding of the species' evolution.

Results: In this study, we constructed the first high-density linkage map for St. Augustinegrass using a genotyping by sequencing (GBS) approach. The integrated linkage map consists of 2871 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and 81 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers, spanning 1241.7 cM, with an average distance of 0.4 cM between markers, and thus represents the densest genetic map for St. Augustinegrass to date. Comparative genomic analysis revealed inter-chromosome arrangements and independent nested chromosome fusion events that occurred after St. Augustinegrass, foxtail millet, sorghum, and rice diverged from a common ancestor. Forty-eight candidate quantitative trait loci (QTL) were detected for turf quality-related traits, including overall turf quality, leaf texture, genetic color, and turf density. Three hot spot regions were identified on linkage groups LG3 and LG8, where multi-QTL for different traits overlapped. Several leaf development related genes were contained within these identified QTL regions.

Conclusions: This study developed the first high-density genetic map and identified putative QTL related to turf quality, which provide valuable genetic resources for marker-assisted selection (MAS) in St. Augustinegrass.

Keywords: Comparative genomic analysis; Linkage map; QTL; St. Augustinegrass.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of molecular markers on parental and integrated genetic maps of St. Augustinegrass. a Map of parent ‘Raleigh’. b Map of parent ‘Seville’. c Integrated map from both parents. A black bar indicates a molecular maker. Linkage group number is shown on x-axis and genetic distance is shown on y-axis (cM)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Genomic comparison between the St. Augustinegrass and foxtail millet genomes. a, b Dot-plot diagram showing synteny relationships between St. Augustinegrass LGs and foxtail millet chromosomes. Each dot represents a DNA marker. c, d Circos plot showing genome rearrangements between St. Augustinegrass LGs and foxtail millet chromosomes. RLG indicates Raleigh linkage group. SLG indicates Seville linkage group
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Genomic comparison between the St. Augustinegrass and sorghum genomes. a, b Dot-plot diagram showing synteny relationships between St. Augustinegrass LGs and sorghum chromosomes. Each dot represents a DNA marker. c Circos plot showing genome rearrangements between St. Augustinegrass LGs and sorghum chromosomes. RLG indicates Raleigh linkage group. SLG indicates Seville linkage group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Genomic comparison between the St. Augustinegrass and rice genomes. a, b Dot-plot diagram showing synteny relationships between St. Augustinegrass LGs and rice chromosomes. Each dot represents a DNA marker. c, d Circos plot showing chromosome fusion between St. Augustinegrass LGs and rice chromosomes. RLG indicates Raleigh linkage group. SLG indicates Seville linkage group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sauer JD. Revision of Stenotaphrum (Gramineae: Paniceae) with attention to its historical geography. Brittonia. 1972;24:202–222. doi: 10.2307/2805871. - DOI
    1. Busey P, Davis EH. Turfgrass in the shade environment. Proc Fla State Hort Soc. 1991;104:353–358.
    1. Milla-Lewis SR, Zuleta MC, Van Esbroeck GA, Quesenberry KH, Kenworthy KE. Cytological and molecular characterization of genetic diversity in Stenotaphrum. Crop Sci. 2013;53(1):296–308. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2012.04.0234. - DOI
    1. Kellogg EA. Flowering Plants. Monocots: Poaceae (Vol. 13) New York: Springer; 2015.
    1. Parrish DJ, Fike JH. The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2005;24(5–6):423–459. doi: 10.1080/07352680500316433. - DOI

Substances

LinkOut - more resources