Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Dec 12;19(1):356.
doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1150-8.

Effect of ultrafiltration during hemodialysis on hepatic and total-body water: an observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Effect of ultrafiltration during hemodialysis on hepatic and total-body water: an observational study

Claire J Grant et al. BMC Nephrol. .

Abstract

Background: The hepatic circulation is involved in adaptive systemic responses to circulatory stress. However, it is vulnerable to both chronic hypervolemia and cardiac dysfunction. The influence of hemodialysis (HD) and ultrafiltration (UF) upon liver water content has been understudied. We conducted a detailed pilot study to characterize the effects of HD upon liver water content and stiffness, referenced to peripheral fluid mobilization and total body water.

Methods: We studied 14 established HD patients without liver disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) together with ultrasound-based elastography and bioimpedance assessment were employed to measure hepatic water content and stiffness, body composition, and water content in the calf pre- and post-HD.

Results: Mean UF volume was 8.13 ± 4.4 mL/kg/hr. Fluid removal was accompanied with effective mobilization of peripheral water (measured with MRI within the thigh) from 0.85 ± 0.21 g/mL to 0.83 ± 0.18 g/mL, and reduction in total body water (38.9 ± 9.4 L to 37.4 ± 8.6 L). However, directly-measured liver water content did not decrease (0.57 ± 0.1 mL/g to 0.79 ± 0.3 m L/g). Liver water content and IVC diameter were inversely proportional (r = - 0.57, p = 0.03), a relationship which persisted after dialysis.

Conclusions: In contrast to the reduced total body water content, liver water content did not decrease post-HD, consistent with a diversion of blood to the hepatic circulation, in those with signs of greater circulatory stress. This novel observation suggests that there is a unique hepatic response to HD with UF and that the liver may play a more important role in intradialytic hypotension and fluid shifts than currently appreciated.

Keywords: Chronic hemodialysis; Fluid overload; Intradilyatic hypotension; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ultrafiltration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ information

CJG has complated her MD and is pursing her PhD in Medicine. The result of this study will form part of her thesis. SSH is a mid-career scientist, who completed her MD in 2005 and PhD in medical biophysics in 2015. Her research expertise is in the areas of extracorporeal therapies. She has received several grants to conduct novol imaging studies in patients with renal disease. She is a co-supervisor for CJG.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This observational study was approved by the Health Sciences Research Ethics Board at the University of Western Ontario (HSREB106868). Written consent was obtained from all patients who took part in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

CAM reports grants from General Electric outside the submitted work.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Water image from CSE-MRI reconstruction showing the Region of Interest (ROI) in the liver for which liver water content was computed. ROIs were drawn to avoid major vessels, and regions which contained water-fat swaps. A water phantom is shown in the lower left, which was used for normalization to obtain absolute. These two images were from Patient 14. Top: pre-dialysis (0.7) and bottom: post-dialysis (0.83)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
FSE image indicating the inferior vena cava and abdominal aorta, and the major diameter of each
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relationship between liver water content and IVC diameter pre-dialysis
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Change in liver water content with dialysis and the relationship with haemodynamic stability during HD. a: Liver water before and after dialysis. b: Liver water and fall in blood pressure c: Liver water and nadir blood pressure. d: IVC diameter and nadir blood pressure

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Curtis BM, Parfrey PS. Congestive heart failure in chronic kidney disease: disease-specific mechanisms of systolic and diastolic heart failure and management. Cardiol Clin. 2005;23(3):275–284. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2005.04.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zoccali C, Benedetto FA, Mallamaci F, et al. Left ventricular mass monitoring in the follow-up of dialysis patients: prognostic value of left ventricular hypertrophy progression. Kidney Int. 2004;65(4):1492–1498. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00530.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McIntyre CW, Burton JO, Selby NM, et al. Hemodialysis-induced cardiac dysfunction is associated with an acute reduction in global and segmental myocardial blood flow. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(1):19–26. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03170707. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burton JO, Jefferies HJ, Selby NM, McIntyre CW. Hemodialysis-induced repetitive myocardial injury results in global and segmental reduction in systolic cardiac function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(12):1925–1931. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04470709. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McIntyre CW. Recurrent circulatory stress: the dark side of dialysis. Semin Dial. 2010;23(5):449–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2010.00782.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms