Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Dec;14(3):459-463.
doi: 10.5152/iao.2018.5374.

Differences in Antibiotic Resistance of MRSA Infections in Patients with Various Types of Otitis Media

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differences in Antibiotic Resistance of MRSA Infections in Patients with Various Types of Otitis Media

Moo Kyun Park et al. J Int Adv Otol. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: We investigated the epidemiological and antibiotic resistance differences in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in patients with otitis media with effusion (OME), acute otitis media (AOM), chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), and chronic cholesteatomatous otitis media (CCOM).

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with newly identified MRSA infections from January 2009 through January 2017. Overall, 3,522 patients from 10 tertiary referral hospitals were included in the study. An antibiotic sensitivity test was performed for each isolate.

Results: MRSA infections in patients with CSOM and CCOM were more resistant to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, and tetracycline. Patients showed good susceptibility to rifampicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), and vancomycin.

Conclusion: MRSA infections in various otitis media cases showed different resistance patterns. MRSA infections in patients with COM and CCOM were more resistant to antibiotics than those in patients with OME and AOM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Similar articles

References

    1. Marom T, Tan A, Wilkinson GS, Pierson KS, Freeman JL, Chonmaitree T. Trends in otitis media-related health care use in the United States, 2001–2011. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168:68–75. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3924. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teele DW, Klein JO, Chase C, Menyuk P, Rosner BA. Otitis media in infancy and intellectual ability, school achievement, speech, and language at age 7 years. Greater Boston Otitis Media Study Group. J Infect Dis. 1990;162:685–94. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.3.685. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lahikainen EA. Clinico-bacteriologic studies on acute otitis media aspiration of the tympanum as a diagnostic and therapeutic method. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1953;107:7–82. - PubMed
    1. Grijalva CG, Nuorti JP, Griffin MR. Antibiotic prescription rates for acute respiratory tract infections in US ambulatory settings. JAMA. 2009;302:758–66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1163. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daly KA, Hoffman HJ, Kvaerner KJ, Kvestad E, Casselbrant ML, Homoe P, et al. Epidemiology, natural history, and risk factors: panel report from the Ninth International Research Conference on Otitis Media. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;74:231–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.006. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms