Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 27;57(3):e01847-18.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01847-18. Print 2019 Mar.

Noninvasive Detection of Tuberculosis by Oral Swab Analysis

Affiliations

Noninvasive Detection of Tuberculosis by Oral Swab Analysis

Angelique K Luabeya et al. J Clin Microbiol. .

Abstract

Diagnostic tests for tuberculosis (TB) usually require collection of sputum, a viscous material derived from human airways. Sputum can be difficult and hazardous to collect and challenging to process in the laboratory. Oral swabs have been proposed as alternative sample types that are noninvasive and easy to collect. This study evaluated the biological feasibility of oral swab analysis (OSA) for the diagnosis of TB. Swabs were tested from South African adult subjects, including sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF (GeneXpert)-confirmed TB patients (n = 138), sputum GeneXpert-negative but culture-positive TB patients (n = 10), ill non-TB patients (n = 37), and QuantiFERON-negative controls (n = 34). Swabs were analyzed by using a manual, nonnested quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting IS6110 Two swab brands and three sites within the oral cavity were compared. Tongue swabbing yielded significantly stronger signals than cheek or gum swabbing. A flocked swab performed better than a more expensive paper swab. In a two-phase study, tongue swabs (two per subject) exhibited a combined sensitivity of 92.8% relative to sputum GeneXpert. Relative to all laboratory-diagnosed TB, the diagnostic yields of sputum GeneXpert (1 sample per subject) and OSA (2 samples per subject) were identical at 49/59 (83.1%) each. The specificity of the OSA was 91.5%. An analysis of "air swabs" suggested that most false-positive results were due to contamination of manual PCRs. With the development of appropriate automated methods, oral swabs could facilitate TB diagnosis in clinical settings and patient populations that are limited by the physical or logistical challenges of sputum collection.

Keywords: GeneXpert MTB/RIF; PCR; POC; molecular diagnosis; nonsputum sampling; oral swab; point of care; tuberculosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Flow diagram of subject enrollment and testing by OSA. Total subjects enrolled in the study (combined n = 343) are shown in the top row of boxes. The bottom row shows subjects tested by OSA (combined n = 221).

References

    1. World Health Organization. 2017. Global tuberculosis report 2017. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
    1. Lawn SD, Mwaba P, Bates M, Piatek A, Alexander H, Marais BJ, Cuevas LE, McHugh TD, Zijenah L, Kapata N, Abubakar I, McNerney R, Hoelscher M, Memish ZA, Migliori GB, Kim P, Maeurer M, Schito M, Zumla A. 2013. Advances in tuberculosis diagnostics: the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and future prospects for a point-of-care test. Lancet Infect Dis 13:349–361. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70008-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shenai S, Amisano D, Ronacher K, Kriel M, Banada PP, Song T, Lee M, Joh JS, Winter J, Thayer R, Via LE, Kim S, Barry CE, Walzl G, Alland D. 2013. Exploring alternative biomaterials for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-negative patients by use of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay. J Clin Microbiol 51:4161–4166. doi:10.1128/JCM.01743-13. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawn SD. 2013. Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med 19:280–288. doi:10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835f1b70. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Denkinger CM, Pai M. 2012. Point-of-care tuberculosis diagnosis: are we there yet? Lancet Infect Dis 12:169–170. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70257-2. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types