Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;33(5):754-760.
doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0307-9. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

In vivo confocal microscopy classification in the diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction

Affiliations

In vivo confocal microscopy classification in the diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction

Matthieu Randon et al. Eye (Lond). 2019 May.

Erratum in

Abstract

Aim: Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is one of the most common disorders in ophthalmology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of this in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM)-MGD description to classify patients affected by clinical MGD and measure the correlation with standard clinical criteria and subjective symptoms.

Methods: One hundred eyes of 100 patients suffering from MGD and 15 eyes of normal subjects were included. A comprehensive evaluation with the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), Schirmer test, tear break-up time (TBUT), tear osmolarity, Oxford score, Meibomian gland expression, palpebral IVCM, and meibography was performed. Then each patient was classified using a new IVCM classification: type 0 for normality, type 1 for meibum obstruction, type 2 for inflammation, and type 3 for fibrosis.

Results: The mean age of patients was 52 ± 20 years old, the OSDI was 38 ± 23, the BUT 5 ± 2.6 s, the Schirmer test 13 ± 7 mm, tear osmolarity 300 ± 11 osmol/L, the Oxford score 0.5 ± 0.6, the meibum expression score 1.7 ± 1.02, and the meibography score 1.3 ± 0.9. The IVCM MG classification of the 15 normal subjects was 0. For MGD patients, 29% were in type 1, 40% were type 2, and 31% were type 3. The patients in IVCM MG type 2 had a higher OSDI (p = 0.001) compared with the other types. There was a strong correlation between the IVCM score and the meibography score (r = 0.71 p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: This new IVCM classification provided a practical pathophysiological system for MGD. By giving objective criteria, this IVCM classification may help advance the understanding of patients' symptoms and enhance treatment effectiveness in MGD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
MGD staging with meibography: a stage 0, no gland loss; b stage 1, loss <33%; c stage 2, loss between 33 and 66%; d stage 3, loss >66%
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
MGD staging analyzed with in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). a type 0 in IVCM, normal meibomian glands; b type 1 in IVCM, lumen obstruction with minimal inflammation; c type 2 in IVCM, intraepithelial, and interglandular inflammation; d, type 3 in IVCM, fibrosis with epithelium destruction

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schaumberg DA, Nichols JJ, Papas EB, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on the epidemiology of, and associated risk factors for MGD. Invest Ophthalomol Vis Sci. 2011;52:1994–2005. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997e. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hom MM, Martinson JR, Knapp LL, et al. Prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67:710–2. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199009000-00010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Molinari JF, Stanek S. Meibomian gland status comparison between active duty personnel and U.S. veterans. Mil Med. 2000;165:591–3. doi: 10.1093/milmed/165.8.591. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCulley JP, Shine WE. Meibomian gland function and the tear lipid layer. Ocul Surf. 2003;1:97–106. doi: 10.1016/S1542-0124(12)70138-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baudouin C. Revisiting meibomian gland dysfunction. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2014;37:757–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2014.10.001. - DOI - PubMed