Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr;174(2):315-324.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-05084-w. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

Clinical findings and outcomes of MRI staging of breast cancer in a diverse population

Affiliations

Clinical findings and outcomes of MRI staging of breast cancer in a diverse population

Akshara Raghavendra et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the effect of patient factors, and resulting surgical management in underserved and ethnically diverse breast cancer (BC) patient populations have been understudied.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 1116 consecutive patients who were newly diagnosed with in situ or invasive BC with preoperative staging MRI. Non-index lesions (NILs) were defined as abnormal MRI findings with BI-RADS score of 4 or 5 in breast or axillary nodes not previously detected by conventional imaging. Occult cancers (OCs) were NILs found to be malignant by biopsy or surgery. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between probabilities of NILs or OCs and patient characteristics.

Results: Staging MRI detected NILs and OCs in 24% and 7.5% of patients, respectively. Of 1116 patients, 271 (24%) had 327 NILs, and 84 (7.5%) had 87 OCs. Follow-up information was available for 306 NILs. Ipsilateral breast NILs (n = 124) were seen in 115 patients (10.3%), with OCs (n = 51) seen in 48 patients (4.4%). Contralateral breast NILs (n = 134) were seen in 118 (10.6%) patients, with OCs (n = 20) seen in 20 patients (1.8%). Laterality (p < 0.001) and disease stage (p = 0.018) were associated with probability of OC. Patients without BRCA mutations had a significantly higher probability of having NILs (p = 0.003) but not OCs.

Conclusions: Our study provides useful estimates of the rates of NILs and OCs anticipated in a younger, uninsured, ethnically diverse population. Prospective trials and larger pooled retrospective analyses are needed to define the long-term impacts of MRI staging after a BC diagnosis.

Keywords: BRCA; Body mass index; Breast density; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoadjuvant therapy; Non-index lesions; Occult cancer; Risk factors; Screening; Underserved populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Contains the distribution of patients from the total series to patients with non-index lesions (NIL) and occult cancers, where (a) Laterality of patients with NIL were 150 ipsilateral (150/1116 = 13.4%), 124 contralateral (124/1116 = 11.1%). Laterality of occult cancers (b) were 63 ipsilateral (63/1098) 5.7% with (58/1098) 5.3% invasive, (5/1098) 0.46 % in situ and 21 contralateral (21/1098)1.9 % with (16/1098) 1.5 % were invasive, (5/1098) 0.46% in situ. (NOTE the denominator for OC’s represents those not lost to follow up)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Warner E, Hill K, Causer P et al. (2011) Prospective study of breast cancer incidence in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation under surveillance with and without magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 29:1664–1669 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnaout A, Catley C, Booth CM et al. (2015) Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer: a Canadian population-based study. JAMA Oncol 1:1238–1250 - PubMed
    1. Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG et al. (2003) Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 98:468–473 - PubMed
    1. Wernli KJ, DeMartini WB, Ichikawa L et al. (2014) Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice. JAMA Intern Med 174:125–132 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK et al. (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:1295–1303 - PubMed