Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):164-170.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5543.

Comparison of Immediate vs Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients With Synchronous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib: The SURTIME Randomized Clinical Trial

Axel Bex  1 , Peter Mulders  2 , Michael Jewett  3 , John Wagstaff  4 , Johannes V van Thienen  1 , Christian U Blank  1 , Roland van Velthoven  5 , Maria Del Pilar Laguna  6 , Lori Wood  7 , Harm H E van Melick  8 , Maureen J Aarts  9 , J B Lattouf  10 , Thomas Powles  11 , Igle Jan de Jong Md PhD  12 , Sylvie Rottey  13 , Bertrand Tombal  14 , Sandrine Marreaud  15 , Sandra Collette  15   16 , Laurence Collette  15 , John Haanen  1
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of Immediate vs Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients With Synchronous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib: The SURTIME Randomized Clinical Trial

Axel Bex et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Erratum in

  • Error in Author Affiliation.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):271. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0117. JAMA Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30763426 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: In clinical practice, patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been offered cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by targeted therapy, but the optimal sequence of surgery and systemic therapy is unknown.

Objective: To examine whether a period of sunitinib therapy before CN improves outcome compared with immediate CN followed by sunitinib.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial began as a phase 3 trial on July 14, 2010, and continued until March 24, 2016, with a median follow-up of 3.3 years and a clinical cutoff date for this report of May 5, 2017. Patients with mRCC of clear cell subtype, resectable primary tumor, and 3 or fewer surgical risk factors were studied.

Interventions: Immediate CN followed by sunitinib therapy vs treatment with 3 cycles of sunitinib followed by CN in the absence of progression followed by sunitinib therapy.

Main outcomes and measures: Progression-free survival was the primary end point, which needed a sample size of 458 patients. Because of poor accrual, the independent data monitoring committee endorsed reporting the intention-to-treat 28-week progression-free rate (PFR) instead. Overall survival (OS), adverse events, and postoperative progression were secondary end points.

Results: The study closed after 5.7 years with 99 patients (80 men and 19 women; mean [SD] age, 60 [8.5] years). The 28-week PFR was 42% in the immediate CN arm (n = 50) and 43% in the deferred CN arm (n = 49) (P = .61). The intention-to-treat OS hazard ratio of deferred vs immediate CN was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.34-0.95; P = .03), with a median OS of 32.4 months (95% CI, 14.5-65.3 months) in the deferred CN arm and 15.0 months (95% CI, 9.3-29.5 months) in the immediate CN arm. In the deferred CN arm, 48 of 49 patients (98%; 95% CI, 89%-100%) received sunitinib vs 40 of 50 (80%; 95% CI, 67%-89%) in the immediate arm. Systemic progression before planned CN in the deferred CN arm resulted in a per-protocol recommendation against nephrectomy in 14 patients (29%; 95% CI, 18%-43%).

Conclusions and relevance: Deferred CN did not improve the 28-week PFR. With the deferred approach, more patients received sunitinib and OS results were higher. Pretreatment with sunitinib may identify patients with inherent resistance to systemic therapy before planned CN. This evidence complements recent data from randomized clinical trials to inform treatment decisions in patients with primary clear cell mRCC requiring sunitinib.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01099423.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Bex reported receiving grants from Pfizer during the conduct of the study; receiving personal fees from Pfizer, Eisai Co., Ipsen, EUSA, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; and serving as a member of the steering committee of the IMMotion 010 adjuvant trial in renal cell carcinoma from Roche outside the submitted work. Dr de Jong reported receiving grants from Astellas Pharma and personal fees from Bayer Pharma outside the submitted work. Dr Jewett reported receiving honoraria from Pfizer, Ipsen, Olympus, and Theralase Therapeutics. Dr van Thienen reported receiving personal fees from Roche and fees to his institution for training (European Society for Medical Oncology 2017) from Novartis outside the submitted work. Dr Blank reported receiving personal fees for advisory roles for BMS, MSD, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, and Pfizer and grants from Novartis and BMS outside the submitted work. Dr Lattouf reported receiving honoraria from Janssen and Bayer for participation in advisory boards outside the submitted work. Dr Powles reported receiving grants from AstraZeneca and Roche and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck & Co, and BMS outside the submitted work. Dr Wood reported receiving research funding to her institution from Pfizer and clinical trial funding to her institution from Novartis, Merck & Co, Roche, AstraZeneca, and BMS outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Trial Design
Patients were randomized 1:1 to immediate or deferred nephrectomy. Blue bars indicate sunitinib therapy. Green arrows point to the progression status 4 weeks after nephrectomy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. CONSORT Flow Diagram
aThe numbers of individuals screened for eligibility and the reasons for exclusion were not captured at all sites. bIncluded 10 ineligible patients: no measurable lesion (n = 5), abnormal cardiac function (n = 3), symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis (n = 1), and pneumonia (n = 1). cIncluded 8 ineligible patients: no measurable lesion (n = 1), hypertension (n = 4), abnormal laboratory values (n = 2), and lung cancer (n = 1). dSix patients underwent nephrectomy off protocol.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Long-term Outcomes in All Randomized Patients in the Intention-to-Treat Population
HR indicates hazard ratio.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Flanigan RC, Salmon SE, Blumenstein BA, et al. . Nephrectomy followed by interferon alfa-2b compared with interferon alfa-2b alone for metastatic renal-cell cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(23):1655-1659. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa003013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mickisch GH, Garin A, van Poppel H, de Prijck L, Sylvester R; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Genitourinary Group . Radical nephrectomy plus interferon-alfa–based immunotherapy compared with interferon alfa alone in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;358(9286):966-970. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06103-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flanigan RC, Mickisch G, Sylvester R, Tangen C, Van Poppel H, Crawford ED. Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cancer: a combined analysis. J Urol. 2004;171(3):1071-1076. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000110610.61545.ae - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, et al. . EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol. 2015;67(5):913-924. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Motzer RJ, Mazumdar M, Bacik J, Berg W, Amsterdam A, Ferrara J. Survival and prognostic stratification of 670 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(8):2530-2540. doi:10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2530 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data