Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;73(1):102-111.
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12162.

Macrophage Mineralocorticoid Receptor Is a Pleiotropic Modulator of Myocardial Infarct Healing

Affiliations

Macrophage Mineralocorticoid Receptor Is a Pleiotropic Modulator of Myocardial Infarct Healing

Daniela Fraccarollo et al. Hypertension. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Myocardial infarction (MI) is a major cause of death worldwide. Here, we identify the macrophage MR (mineralocorticoid receptor) as a crucial pathogenic player in cardiac wound repair after MI. Seven days after left coronary artery ligation, mice with myeloid cell-restricted MR deficiency compared with WT (wild type) controls displayed improved cardiac function and remodeling associated with enhanced infarct neovascularization and scar maturation. Gene expression profiling of heart-resident and infarct macrophages revealed that MR deletion drives macrophage differentiation in the ischemic microenvironment toward a phenotype outside the M1/M2 paradigm, with regulation of multiple interrelated factors controlling wound healing and tissue repair. Mechanistic and functional data suggest that inactivation of the macrophage MR promotes myocardial infarct healing through enhanced efferocytosis of neutrophils, the suppression of free radical formation, and the modulation of fibroblast activation state. Crucially, targeted delivery of MR antagonists to macrophages, with a single administration of RU28318 or eplerenone-containing liposomes at the onset of MI, improved the healing response and protected against cardiac remodeling and functional deterioration, offering an effective and unique therapeutic strategy for cardiac repair.

Keywords: liposomes; macrophages; myocardial infarction; receptors, mineralocorticoid; wound healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mice with myeloid cell–restricted MR (mineralocorticoid receptor) deficiency display improved cardiac function and remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI). A, Representative sections from MRflox and MRLysMCre infarcted hearts and infarct size. B, Representative left ventricular (LV) pressure-volume loops measured in vivo with conductance catheter in sham-operated MRflox (gray) and MRLysMCre (black) mice and in MRflox (orange) and MRLysMCre (blue) mice with MI. C, LV systolic pressure (LVSP), LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes; LV ejection fraction, LV maximal rate of pressure rise (LV dP/dtmax), maximal rate of pressure decline (LV dP/dtmin), and LV dP/dtmax divided by instantaneous pressure (IP) and the time constant of LV pressure isovolumic decay (Tau). Mean±SEM (n=14–16). *P<0.01 vs MRflox.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Enhanced cardiac neovascularization after ischemic injury in MRLysMCre mice. A and B, Immunofluorescence double staining (CD [cluster of differentiation] 31, red; α-SMA [α-smooth muscle actin], green) showing capillaries, coated vessels, and (myo)fibroblasts in the healing myocardium of MRflox and MRLysMCre mice, 7 d after myocardial infarction. In MRLysMCre infarcts, the expression of α-SMA was mostly restricted to pericytes and arterioles. C, Capillary density quantification in MRflox and MRLysMCre mice. Mean±SEM (n=6). *P<0.01 vs MRflox.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Enhanced collagen scar formation in MRLysMCre mice. Immunofluorescence staining for α-SMA (α-smooth muscle actin; green) showing the presence of myofibroblasts (spindle-shaped α-SMA–positive cells) within the infarct region of (A) MRflox and (B) MRLysMCre mice. MRLysMCre infarcts exhibited a loss of α-SMA expression in (myo)fibroblasts. CF, Sirius red polarization microscopy of scar sections revealed a matrix with a predominance of thin and loosely assembled collagen fibers in MRflox mice (C and E) and well-aligned and tightly packed collagen fibers in MRLysMCre infarcts (D and F), 7 d after myocardial infarction. G, Infarct collagen content, ratio of orange-red (O-R) thick to yellow-green (Y-G) thin collagen fibers, and fiber straightness and alignment. Mean±SEM (n=6). *P<0.05 vs MRflox.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
MR (mineralocorticoid receptor) inactivation drives macrophage differentiation in the ischemic microenvironment toward a phenotype outside the M1/M2 activation paradigm. A, Flow cytometry and gating strategy identifying macrophages (CD [cluster of differentiation] 45+/CD11b+/Ly6G/F4/80+ cells −Ly6Clow and Ly6Chigh) and neutrophils (CD45+/CD11b+/F4/80/Ly6G+ cells) in MRflox and MRLysMCre infarcts, 3 d after coronary artery ligation. SSC indicates side scatter. Mean±SEM (n=5). *P<0.05 vs MRflox. BE, Comparison of gene expression profiles of infarct macrophages from MRLysMCre and MRflox mice (n=3). B, Dot plot showing gene expression of macrophage markers; fold changes of M1/M2-like markers are reported (*Padj<0.1). C, MA plot showing significantly regulated genes with Padj <0.1 (red). D, Volcano plot; significantly regulated genes with P<0.05 (gray) and with fold change >2 (orange) are shown; upregulated efferocytic genes are highlighted (blue). E, Heatmap showing efferocytic gene expression.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Macrophage MR (mineralocorticoid receptor) deficiency is associated with enhanced neutrophil efferocytosis, suppression of free radical formation and the modulation of fibroblast activation. A, Quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the relative gene expression of Mertk, C1qa, C1qb, Gpnmb, Cat, Pxdr4, ApoE, Vegfb, IGF1, and Lcn2. B, Phagocytic index for apoptotic neutrophils and (C) phagocytic capacity for zymosan particles of macrophages (CD [cluster of differentiation] 45+/CD11b+/Ly6G/F4/80+ cells) isolated by cell sorting from MRflox and MRLysMCre infarcts, 3 d after coronary artery ligation. D, Superoxide production by CD45+/CD11b+/Ly6G/F4/80+ macrophages fluorescence-activated cell sorting–isolated from MRflox and MRLysMCre infarcts, assessed using a highly sensitive isocratic ion-pair high performance liquid chromatography–electrochemical method. E, Immunocytochemical staining showing fibroblasts and differentiated α-SMA (α-smooth muscle actin)–positive myofibroblasts (vimentin, red; α-SMA, green) and zymography of conditioned media. Macrophages (CD45+/CD11b+/Ly6G/F4/80+ cells) and fibroblasts (CD45/CD11b/CD31/TER-119/NG2/MEFSK4+ cells) were isolated by cell sorting from the infarct myocardium of MRflox and MRLysMCre mice and cocultured using the Boyden chamber system. Mean±SEM (n=4–5). MMP indicates matrix metalloproteinase. *P<0.05 vs MRflox. HE indicates hydroethidine; IS, internal standard; NG2, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan; MEFSK4, anti-feeder antibody, clone mEF-SK4; and SSC, side scatter.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Targeted delivery of MR (mineralocorticoid receptor) antagonists to macrophages protects against cardiac dysfunction and remodeling after myocardial infarction. A single dose of liposomal RU28318 (Lipo+RU) or liposomal eplerenone (Lipo+Eple) or empty (MR antagonists lacking) liposomes (Lipo) were injected intraperitoneally into mice at the onset of myocardial infarction. A, Sections of infarcted hearts and infarct size. B, Representative left ventricular (LV) pressure-volume loops measured in vivo with conductance catheter, 7 d after myocardial infarction. C, LV systolic pressure (LVSP), LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), LV maximal rate of pressure rise (LV dP/dtmax), maximal rate of pressure decline (LV dP/dtmin), LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, LV ejection fraction, LV dP/dtmax divided by instantaneous pressure (IP), and the time constant of LV pressure isovolumic decay (Tau). Mean±SEM (n=6). *P<0.05 vs Lipo.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fraccarollo D, Galuppo P, Bauersachs J. Novel therapeutic approaches to post-infarction remodelling. Cardiovasc Res. 2012;94:293–303. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvs109. - PubMed
    1. Galuppo P, Vettorazzi S, Hövelmann J, Scholz CJ, Tuckermann JP, Bauersachs J, Fraccarollo D. The glucocorticoid receptor in monocyte-derived macrophages is critical for cardiac infarct repair and remodeling. FASEB J. 2017;31:5122–5132. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700317R. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pfeffer MA, Rutherford JD. Therapeutic attenuation of cardiac remodeling after acute myocardial infarction: a conversation with Marc A. Pfeffer, MD, PhD. Circulation. 2018;137:2430–2434. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033665. - PubMed
    1. Prabhu SD, Frangogiannis NG. The biological basis for cardiac repair after myocardial infarction: from inflammation to fibrosis. Circ Res. 2016;119:91–112. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303577. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beygui F, Van Belle E, Ecollan P, Machecourt J, Hamm CW, Lopez De Sa E, Flather M, Verheugt FWA, Vicaut E, Zannad F, Pitt B, Montalescot G. Individual participant data analysis of two trials on aldosterone blockade in myocardial infarction. Heart. 2018;104:1843–1849. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018–312950. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms