Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Feb/Mar;11(2):239-264.
doi: 10.1080/19420862.2018.1553476. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

Structure, heterogeneity and developability assessment of therapeutic antibodies

Affiliations
Review

Structure, heterogeneity and developability assessment of therapeutic antibodies

Yingda Xu et al. MAbs. 2019 Feb/Mar.

Abstract

Increasing attention has been paid to developability assessment with the understanding that thorough evaluation of monoclonal antibody lead candidates at an early stage can avoid delays during late-stage development. The concept of developability is based on the knowledge gained from the successful development of approximately 80 marketed antibody and Fc-fusion protein drug products and from the lessons learned from many failed development programs over the last three decades. Here, we reviewed antibody quality attributes that are critical to development and traditional and state-of-the-art analytical methods to monitor those attributes. Based on our collective experiences, a practical workflow is proposed as a best practice for developability assessment including in silico evaluation, extended characterization and forced degradation using appropriate analytical methods that allow characterization with limited material consumption and fast turnaround time.

Keywords: Developability; monoclonal antibody; posttranslational modifications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Major components of mAb developability assessment.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Workflow of structural and CMC liabilities assessment.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Recommended attributes for developability assessment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lavoisier A, Schlaeppi JM.. Early developability screen of therapeutic antibody candidates using Taylor dispersion analysis and UV area imaging detection. MAbs. 2015;7:77–83. doi:10.4161/19420862.2014.985544. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dobson CL, Devine PW, Phillips JJ, Higazi DR, Lloyd C, Popovic B, Arnold J, Buchanan A, Lewis A, Goodman J, et al. Engineering the surface properties of a human monoclonal antibody prevents self-association and rapid clearance in vivo. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38644. doi:10.1038/srep38644. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang X, Xu W, Dukleska S, Benchaar S, Mengisen S, Antochshuk V, Cheung J, Mann L, Babadjanova Z, Rowand J, et al. Developability studies before initiation of process development: improving manufacturability of monoclonal antibodies. MAbs. 2013;5:787–794. doi:10.4161/mabs.25269. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strohl WR. Current progress in innovative engineered antibodies. Protein Cell. 2018;9:86–120. doi:10.1007/s13238-017-0457-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carter PJ, Lazar GA. Next generation antibody drugs: pursuit of the ‘high-hanging fruit’. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17:197–223. doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.227. - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources