Acceptable medication non-adherence: A crowdsourcing study among French physicians for commonly prescribed medications
- PMID: 30543701
- PMCID: PMC6292617
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209023
Acceptable medication non-adherence: A crowdsourcing study among French physicians for commonly prescribed medications
Abstract
Background: Achieving good medication adherence is a major challenge for patients with chronic conditions. Our study aimed to assess the Threshold for Unacceptable Risk of Non-adherence (TURN), defined as the threshold at which physicians consider the health risks incurred by patients due to medication non-adherence unacceptable, for the most commonly prescribed drugs in France.
Methods: We conducted an online study using a crowdsourcing approach among French general practitioners and specialists from September 2016 to August 2017. Physicians assessed the TURN for various levels of missed doses by evaluating a series of randomly presented clinical vignettes, each presenting a given medication with a given therapeutic indication. For each "drug-indication group" (i.e., all drugs from the same pharmacological class with a similar therapeutic indication): 1) we described the distribution of physicians' assessments, 2) we provided a summary estimate of the TURN, defined as the frequency of missed doses above which 75% of the physicians' assessments were located; 3) we computed the number of pill boxes reimbursed in France in 2016 to put our results into context.
Results: We collected a total of 5365 assessments from 544 physicians, each of whom evaluated a random sample among 528 distinct clinical vignettes. Estimates of the TURN varied widely across drug-indication groups, ranging from risk considered unacceptable with 1 daily dose missed per month (e.g., insulin for diabetes) to risk always considered acceptable (e.g., anti-dementia drugs). Drugs with an estimated TURN of over one missing daily dose per week represented 44.9% of the prescription volume of the medications assessed in our study.
Conclusions: According to physicians, the impact of non-adherence may vary greatly. Patient-physician discussions on the variable consequences of non-adherence could lead to a paradigm shift by seeking to reach "optimal adherence" depending on drugs rather than unrealistic "perfect adherence" to all drugs.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures


References
-
- Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353: 487–97. 10.1056/NEJMra050100 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dunbar-Jacob J, Mortimer-Stephens MK. Treatment adherence in chronic disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54 Suppl 1: S57–60. - PubMed
-
- Simpson SH, Eurich DT, Majumdar SR, Padwal RS, Tsuyuki RT, Varney J, et al. A meta-analysis of the association between adherence to drug therapy and mortality. BMJ. 2006;333: 15. doi:bmj.38875.675486.55 [pii] 10.1136/bmj.38875.675486.55 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rasmussen JN, Chong A, Alter DA. Relationship between adherence to evidence-based pharmacotherapy and long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2007;297: 177–86. 10.1001/jama.297.2.177 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ho PM, Rumsfeld JS, Masoudi FA, McClure DL, Plomondon ME, Steiner JF, et al. Effect of medication nonadherence on hospitalization and mortality among patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166: 1836–1841. 10.1001/archinte.166.17.1836 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources