Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Dec;97(49):e13575.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013575.

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal technique versus open surgery with the ULTRAPRO Hernia System for the repair of female primary femoral hernias-an observational retrospective study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal technique versus open surgery with the ULTRAPRO Hernia System for the repair of female primary femoral hernias-an observational retrospective study

Dongfeng Chen et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Femoral hernias (FHs), predominantly seen in females, require surgery for cure. To date, surgical repair of primary FHs in female patients with either open surgery or laparoscopic operation has been poorly documented. We retrospectively investigated the treatment of female primary FHs with open surgery using the ULTRAPRO Hernia System (UHS procedure) or the laparoscopic procedure, namely, the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique. A total of 41 female patients with primary FHs who had undergone UHS or TAPP were included in this study. The procedural parameters, post-surgical complications, treatment expense, and follow-up results were analyzed. The vast majority of patients (39/41) underwent elective operations: 15 received UHS (including 2 emergency cases) and 26 had TAPP (P = .08). The UHS group had a greater average age, due to the fact that FHs occur often in people with advanced age who tend to have systemic disease, limiting the use of general anesthesia required for TAPP. Compared with UHS, TAPP took a significantly shorter time to complete and patients undergoing TAPP had a dramatically shorter hospital stay. While no recurrence was observed in both groups, post-procedure pain and foreign body sensation were reported by significantly more patients in UHS group. The cost was greater with TAPP. Taken together, we concluded that both UHS and TAPP are effective in the management of female FHs. In view of the advantages and disadvantages between the open and the laparoscopic operation, surgeons can select a procedure according to their skills and patients' situation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jenkins JT, O’Dwyer PJ. Inguinal hernias. BMJ 2008;336:269–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. HerniaSurge Group International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 2018;22:1–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Köckerling F, Simons MP. Current concepts of inguinal hernia repair. Visc Med 2018;34:145–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kingsnorth AN, Wright D, Porter CS, et al. Prolene Hernia System compared with Lichtenstein patch: a randomised double blind study of short-term and medium-term outcomes in primary inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 2002;6:113–9. - PubMed
    1. Vironen J, Nieminen J, Eklund A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein patch or Prolene Hernia System for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2006;93:33–9. - PubMed

Publication types