VP-16 + adriamycin vs. adriamycin alone in advanced adenocarcinoma of the breast, phase II, a randomized trial: a Southwest Oncology Group Study
- PMID: 3054453
- DOI: 10.1002/mpo.2950160505
VP-16 + adriamycin vs. adriamycin alone in advanced adenocarcinoma of the breast, phase II, a randomized trial: a Southwest Oncology Group Study
Abstract
One hundred twenty-two patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the breast were randomized to receive adriamycin (AD) alone or a combination of VP-16 plus lower dose adriamycin (VAD). The patients were stratified to good and poor risk. The starting dose (day 1) of AD was 60 mg/m2 for good risk and 45 mg/m2 for poor risk. The starting dose of the VAD combination for the good-risk patient was VP-16, 75 mg/m2 daily x 5 plus adriamycin 35 mg/m2. The poor-risk dose for VAD was VP-16, 50 mg/m2 daily x 5 plus adriamycin, 30 mg/m2 on day 1. The total dose of AD was 450 mg/m2 on both arms. The patients who were on the VAD arm continued on VP-16 maintenance. Both arms were repeated every 21 days. There were 54 evaluable patients on the adriamycin arm and 52 evaluable patients on the VAD arm. Both arms were similar with regard to age, menopausal status, performance status, and prior hormonal therapy. More hematologic toxicity was seen in the adriamycin arm. Complete responses were observed on both arms, three (5%) with adriamycin and three (5%) with combination. Eleven (19%) and ten (18%) partial responses were observed with the adriamycin and VP-16 plus adriamycin, respectively. AD produced more stable disease than VAD (41% vs. 29%). Complete responses were seen only in the good-risk patients. Time to progression was delayed on the combination arm (P = 0.02). The survival in both arms was similar. The addition of VP-16 to adriamycin does not offer an important clinical advantage.
Similar articles
-
A randomized trial fo three cisplatin-containing regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a study of the Umbrian Lung Cancer Group.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1990;26(1):52-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02940294. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1990. PMID: 2157554 Clinical Trial.
-
VP-16 and adriamycin in patients with advanced breast cancer.Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Oct;5(5):505-9. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982. PMID: 6897491
-
Treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma with the combination of etoposide, adriamycin and cisplatin (EAP): comparison between two schedules.Oncology. 1994 Jan-Feb;51(1):102-7. doi: 10.1159/000227319. Oncology. 1994. PMID: 8265093 Clinical Trial.
-
The use of VP-16 plus cisplatin during induction chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer.Semin Oncol. 1986 Sep;13(3 Suppl 3):10-6. Semin Oncol. 1986. PMID: 3020692 Review.
-
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group studies of paclitaxel and doxorubicin in advanced breast cancer.Semin Oncol. 1995 Jun;22(3 Suppl 6):105-8. Semin Oncol. 1995. PMID: 7597425 Review.
Cited by
-
Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD003372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003372.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 19370586 Free PMC article.
-
International guidelines for management of metastatic breast cancer: combination vs sequential single-agent chemotherapy.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Sep 2;101(17):1174-81. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp235. Epub 2009 Aug 5. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009. PMID: 19657108 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.Drugs. 1990 Mar;39(3):438-90. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199039030-00008. Drugs. 1990. PMID: 2184009 Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical