Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 13:363:k4983.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4983.

Much to do with nothing: microsimulation study on time management in primary care

Affiliations

Much to do with nothing: microsimulation study on time management in primary care

Tanner J Caverly et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the credibility of claims that general practitioners lack time for shared decision making and preventive care.

Design: Monte Carlo microsimulation study.

Setting: Primary care, United States.

Participants: Sample of general practitioners (n=1000) representative of annual work hours and patient panel size (n=2000 patients) in the US, derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the time needed to deliver shared decision making for highly recommended preventive interventions in relation to time available for preventive care-the prevention-time-space-deficit (ie, time-space needed by doctor exceeding the time-space available).

Results: On average, general practitioners have 29 minutes each workday to discuss preventive care services (just over two minutes for each clinic visit) with patients, but they need about 6.1 hours to complete shared decision making for preventive care. 100% of the study sample experienced a prevention-time-space-deficit (mean deficit 5.6 h/day) even given conservative (ie, absurdly wishful) time estimates for shared decision making. However, this time deficit could be easily overcome by reducing personal time and shifting gains to work tasks. For example, general practitioners could reduce the frequency of bathroom breaks to every other day and skip time with older children who don't like them much anyway.

Conclusions: This study confirms a widely held suspicion that general practitioners waste valuable time on "personal care" activities. Primary care overlords, once informed about the extent of this vast reservoir of personal time, can start testing methods to "persuade" general practitioners to reallocate more personal time toward bulging clinical demands.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work; TJC reports a grant from Genentech’s Corporate Giving Scientific Program, outside the submitted work. JFB reports personal fees from Astra Zeneca, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Distribution of prevention-time-space-deficit across general practitioners (GPs)
Fig 2
Fig 2
Number of general practitioners (GPs) retiring early owing to additional work hours for preventive services
Fig 3
Fig 3
Identifying vast reservoirs of untapped hours in a general practitioner’s average day. Baseline times for each activity are taken from the American Time Use Survey. To account for additional time spent working for an average doctor compared with average US adult, one hour was subtracted from the category sleeping and grooming, two hours from leisure and sports, and time for “Other activities not elsewhere classified” was cut entirely. Other activities include housework, food preparation, and lawn care; groceries’ shopping, finances, and home and care maintenance; children and family care; care of others in the community; educational activities; religious, civic, and volunteer activities; and telephone calls, mail, and email

Comment in

  • Lausiges Zeitmanagement bei Hausärzten.
    Stiefelhagen P. Stiefelhagen P. MMW Fortschr Med. 2019 Feb;161(3):27. doi: 10.1007/s15006-019-0174-8. MMW Fortschr Med. 2019. PMID: 30778976 German. No abstract available.

References

    1. Dugdale DC, Epstein R, Pantilat SZ. Time and the patient-physician relationship. J Gen Intern Med 1999;14(Suppl 1):S34-40. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00263.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beasley JW, Hankey TH, Erickson R, et al. How many problems do family physicians manage at each encounter? A WReN study. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:405-10. 10.1370/afm.94 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tai-Seale M, McGuire TG, Zhang W. Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Serv Res 2007;42:1871-94. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00689.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Konrad TR, Link CL, Shackelton RJ, et al. It’s about time: physicians’ perceptions of time constraints in primary care medical practice in three national healthcare systems. Med Care 2010;48:95-100. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181c12e6a - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abbo ED, Zhang Q, Zelder M, Huang ES. The increasing number of clinical items addressed during the time of adult primary care visits. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:2058-65. 10.1007/s11606-008-0805-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed