Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018;12(3):181-197.
doi: 10.1007/s11569-018-0319-8. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

Giving Voice to Patients: Developing a Discussion Method to Involve Patients in Translational Research

Marianne Boenink  1 , Lieke van der Scheer  2 , Elisa Garcia  3 , Simone van der Burg  4
Affiliations

Giving Voice to Patients: Developing a Discussion Method to Involve Patients in Translational Research

Marianne Boenink et al. Nanoethics. 2018.

Abstract

Biomedical research policy in recent years has often tried to make such research more 'translational', aiming to facilitate the transfer of insights from research and development (R&D) to health care for the benefit of future users. Involving patients in deliberations about and design of biomedical research may increase the quality of R&D and of resulting innovations and thus contribute to translation. However, patient involvement in biomedical research is not an easy feat. This paper discusses the development of a method for involving patients in (translational) biomedical research aiming to address its main challenges. After reviewing the potential challenges of patient involvement, we formulate three requirements for any method to meaningfully involve patients in (translational) biomedical research. It should enable patients (1) to put forward their experiential knowledge, (2) to develop a rich view of what an envisioned innovation might look like and do, and (3) to connect their experiential knowledge with the envisioned innovation. We then describe how we developed the card-based discussion method 'Voice of patients', and discuss to what extent the method, when used in four focus groups, satisfied these requirements. We conclude that the method is quite successful in mobilising patients' experiential knowledge, in stimulating their imaginaries of the innovation under discussion and to some extent also in connecting these two. More work is needed to translate patients' considerations into recommendations relevant to researchers' activities. It also seems wise to broaden the audience for patients' considerations to other actors working on a specific innovation.

Keywords: Biomedical innovation; Discussion method; Experiential knowledge; Patient involvement; Research and development; Translational research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Examples of story cards
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Examples of application cards
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Examples of issue cards
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Examples of society cards
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Entwistle VA, Renfrew MJ, Yearley S, Forrester J, Lamont T. Lay perspectives: advantages for health research. Br Med J. 1998;316(7129):463–466. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7129.463. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salomon J-J. Science, technology and democracy. Minerva. 2000;38(1):33–51. doi: 10.1023/A:1026552331409. - DOI
    1. Nowotny H. Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Sci Public Policy (SPP) 2003;30(3):151–156. doi: 10.3152/147154303781780461. - DOI
    1. Hanley B, Bradburn J, Barnes M, Evans C, Goodare H, Kelson M, Kent A, Oliver S, Thomas S, Wallcraft J. Involving the public in NHS public health, and social care research: briefing notes for researchers. Eastleigh: Involve; 2004.
    1. Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JE, Bunders JF. The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(11):2575–2584. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.023. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources