Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 14;18(1):205.
doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1208-z.

Using automated electronic medical record data extraction to model ALS survival and progression

Affiliations

Using automated electronic medical record data extraction to model ALS survival and progression

Alex G Karanevich et al. BMC Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: To assess the feasibility of using automated capture of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data to build predictive models for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) outcomes.

Methods: We used an Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside search discovery tool to identify and extract data from 354 ALS patients from the University of Kansas Medical Center EMR. The completeness and integrity of the data extraction were verified by manual chart review. A linear mixed model was used to model disease progression. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the effects of BMI, gender, and age on survival.

Results: Data extracted from the EMR was sufficient to create simple models of disease progression and survival. Several key variables of interest were unavailable without including a manual chart review. The average ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R) baseline score at first clinical visit was 34.08, and average decline was - 0.64 per month. Median survival was 27 months after first visit. Higher baseline ALSFRS-R score and BMI were associated with improved survival, higher baseline age was associated with decreased survival.

Conclusions: This study serves to show that EMR-captured data can be extracted and used to track outcomes in an ALS clinic setting, potentially important for post-marketing research of new drugs, or as historical controls for future studies. However, as automated EMR-based data extraction becomes more widely used there will be a need to standardize ALS data elements and clinical forms for data capture so data can be pooled across academic centers.

Keywords: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Disease progression; Electronic medical record; Motor neuron disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This retrospective chart review was IRB-approved and received a waiver of consent by University of Kansas Medical Center Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board (IRB# STUDY00004291). Patient data was managed on secure servers at KUMC.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

JS is a consultant for aTyr, Acceleron, Fulcrum, Regeneron, and Strongbridge. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient inclusion / exclusion in study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The distributions of baseline scores and monthly disease progression as estimated by the linear mixed effects model. These were calculated from the model by adding the fixed effect of intercept (or slope) to each patient’s estimated random effect of intercept (or slope)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan-Meier survival curves and 95% confidence interval for KUMC patients. The horizontal line represents the median survival time, equivalent to where the y-axis is 0.5

References

    1. WRITING GROUP ON BEHALF OF THE EDARAVONE (MCI-186) ALS 18 STUDY GROUP Exploratory double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of edaravone (MCI-186) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Japan ALS severity classification: grade 3, requiring assistance for eating, excretion or ambulation) Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2017;18(sup1):40–48. doi: 10.1080/21678421.2017.1361441. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goyal NA, Mozaffar T. Experimental trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review of recently completed, ongoing and planned trials using existing and novel drugs. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2014;23(11):1541–1551. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2014.933807. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Katyal N, Govindarajan R. Shortcomings in the Current Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Trials and Potential Solutions for Improvement. Front Neurol. 2017;8 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626834/ [cited 17 Sep 2018]. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paul Mehta M. Prevalence of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis — United States, 2012–2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016;65 Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/ss/ss6508a1.htm [cited 17 Sep 2018]. - PubMed
    1. Zach N, Ennist DL, Taylor AA, Alon H, Sherman A, Kueffner R, et al. Being PRO-ACTive: what can a clinical trial database reveal about ALS? Neurotherapeutics. 2015;12(2):417–423. doi: 10.1007/s13311-015-0336-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed