Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun;94(3):999-1022.
doi: 10.1111/brv.12488. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

Trait-based ecology of terrestrial arthropods

Affiliations
Review

Trait-based ecology of terrestrial arthropods

Mark K L Wong et al. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

In focusing on how organisms' generalizable functional properties (traits) interact mechanistically with environments across spatial scales and levels of biological organization, trait-based approaches provide a powerful framework for attaining synthesis, generality and prediction. Trait-based research has considerably improved understanding of the assembly, structure and functioning of plant communities. Further advances in ecology may be achieved by exploring the trait-environment relationships of non-sessile, heterotrophic organisms such as terrestrial arthropods, which are geographically ubiquitous, ecologically diverse, and often important functional components of ecosystems. Trait-based studies and trait databases have recently been compiled for groups such as ants, bees, beetles, butterflies, spiders and many others; however, the explicit justification, conceptual framework, and primary-evidence base for the burgeoning field of 'terrestrial arthropod trait-based ecology' have not been well established. Consequently, there is some confusion over the scope and relevance of this field, as well as a tendency for studies to overlook important assumptions of the trait-based approach. Here we aim to provide a broad and accessible overview of the trait-based ecology of terrestrial arthropods. We first define and illustrate foundational concepts in trait-based ecology with respect to terrestrial arthropods, and justify the application of trait-based approaches to the study of their ecology. Next, we review studies in community ecology where trait-based approaches have been used to elucidate how assembly processes for terrestrial arthropod communities are influenced by niche filtering along environmental gradients (e.g. climatic, structural, and land-use gradients) and by abiotic and biotic disturbances (e.g. fire, floods, and biological invasions). We also review studies in ecosystem ecology where trait-based approaches have been used to investigate biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships: how the functional diversity of arthropod communities relates to a host of ecosystem functions and services that they mediate, such as decomposition, pollination and predation. We then suggest how future work can address fundamental assumptions and limitations by investigating trait functionality and the effects of intraspecific variation, assessing the potential for sampling methods to bias the traits and trait values observed, and enhancing the quality and consolidation of trait information in databases. A roadmap to guide observational trait-based studies is also presented. Lastly, we highlight new areas where trait-based studies on terrestrial arthropods are well positioned to advance ecological understanding and application. These include examining the roles of competitive, non-competitive and (multi-)trophic interactions in shaping coexistence, and macro-scaling trait-environment relationships to explain and predict patterns in biodiversity and ecosystem functions across space and time. We hope this review will spur and guide future applications of the trait-based framework to advance ecological insights from the most diverse eukaryotic organisms on Earth.

Keywords: ant; bee; beetle; butterfly; community assembly; ecosystem function; functional diversity; functional trait; insect; invertebrate; review; spider.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Attributes of trait‐based ecology (modified after Shipley et al., 2016). Five defining attributes of trait‐based ecology (A1–5) are listed, with examples from studies on plants and terrestrial arthropods. These attributes distinguish studies using trait‐based approaches from those using other approaches (e.g. taxonomy and phylogenetics). Not all trait‐based studies display all attributes, but at minimum they should display A1; thereafter, depending on the specific ecological question, studies may display one or a combination of the other attributes (A2–5). Note that trait‐based research is not constrained to a particular organizational scale or set of ecological phenomena; for instance, studies displaying A2 may investigate community ecology, studies displaying A3 may investigate ecosystem ecology, and studies displaying A5 may investigate macroecology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Roadmap for observational trait‐based studies on terrestrial arthropod communities. The majority of trait‐based studies on terrestrial arthropod communities rely on observational data. To provide accurate explanations for ecological phenomena and high‐quality trait data for further use, it is crucial that observational studies are robustly designed to address commonly overlooked assumptions and limitations. Here, objectives and relevant considerations for important stages of trait‐based research are suggested.

References

    1. Adis, J. (1997). Terrestrial invertebrates: survival strategies, group spectrum, dominance and activity patterns In Junk, W (ed. The Central Amazon Floodplain. Ecology of a Pulsing System ), pp. 299–317. Springer, Berlin.
    1. Adler, P. B. , Hillerislambers, J. & Levine, J. M. (2007). A niche for neutrality. Ecology Letters 10, 95–104. - PubMed
    1. Aguirre‐Gutiérrez, J. , Kissling, W. D. , Carvalheiro, L. G. , WallisDeVries, M. F. , Franzén, M. & Biesmeijer, J. C. (2016). Functional traits help to explain half‐century long shifts in pollinator distributions. Scientific Reports 6, 24451. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aguirre‐Gutiérrez, J. , WallisDeVries, M. F. , Marshall, L. , van't Zelfde, M. , Villalobos‐Arámbula, A. R. , Boekelo, B. , Bartholomeus, H. , Franzén, M. & Biesmeijer, J. C. (2017). Butterflies show different functional and species diversity in relationship to vegetation structure and land use. Global Ecology and Biogeography 26, 1126–1137.
    1. Andersen, A. N. (1995). A classification of Australian ant communities, based on functional groups which parallel plant life‐forms in relation to stress and disturbance. Journal of Biogeography 22, 15–29.

Publication types