Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Dec;23(12):1-17.
doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.12.120901.

Review of light parameters and photobiomodulation efficacy: dive into complexity

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Review of light parameters and photobiomodulation efficacy: dive into complexity

Randa Zein et al. J Biomed Opt. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy, previously known as low-level laser therapy, was discovered more than 50 years ago, yet there is still no agreement on the parameters and protocols for its clinical application. Some groups have recommended the use of a power density less than 100 mW/cm2 and an energy density of 4 to 10 J/cm2 at the level of the target tissue. Others recommend as much as 50 J/cm2 at the tissue surface. The wide range of parameters that can be applied (wavelength, energy, fluence, power, irradiance, pulse mode, treatment duration, and repetition) in some cases has led to contradictory results. In our review, we attempt to evaluate the range of effective and ineffective parameters in PBM. Studies in vitro with cultured cells or in vivo with different tissues were divided into those with higher numbers of mitochondria (muscle, brain, heart, nerve) or lower numbers of mitochondria (skin, tendon, cartilage). Graphs were plotted of energy density against power density. Although the results showed a high degree of variability, cells/tissues with high numbers of mitochondria tended to respond to lower doses of light than those with lower number of mitochondria. Ineffective studies in cells with high mitochondrial activity appeared to be more often due to over-dosing than to under-dosing.

Keywords: effective and ineffective studies; low-level laser therapy; mitochondrial numbers; parameters; photobiomodulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Studies on PBM of cells in vitro with higher numbers of mitochondria. (a) Effective (positive studies), (b) ineffective (negative studies), and (c) combination of effective (positive studies), and ineffective (negative studies).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Studies on PBM of cells in vitro with lower numbers of mitochondria. (a) Effective (positive studies), (b) ineffective (negative studies), and (c) combination of effective (positive studies) and ineffective (negative studies).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Studies on PBM of tissues in vivo with higher numbers of mitochondria. (a) Effective (positive studies), (b) ineffective (negative studies), and (c) combination of effective (positive studies) and ineffective (negative studies).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Studies on PBM of tissues in vivo with lower numbers of mitochondria. (a) Effective (positive studies), (b) ineffective (negative studies), and (c) combination of effective (positive studies) and ineffective (negative studies).

References

    1. Mester E., et al. , “Stimulation of wound healing by means of laser rays. (Clinical and electron microscopical study),” Acta Chir. Acad. Sci. Hung. 19(2), 163–170 (1978). - PubMed
    1. Mester E., Szende B., Gartner P., “The effect of laser beams on the growth of hair in mice,” Radiobiol. Radiother. (Berl) 9(5), 621–626 (1968). - PubMed
    1. Chung H., et al. , “The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy,” Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40(2), 516–533 (2012). 10.1007/s10439-011-0454-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jenkins P. A., Carroll J. D., “How to report low-level laser therapy (LLLT)/photomedicine dose and beam parameters in clinical and laboratory studies,” Photomed. Laser Surg. 29(12), 785–787 (2011). 10.1089/pho.2011.9895 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martius F., “Das Amdt-Schulz Grandgesetz,” Munch Med. Wschr 70, 1005–1006 (1923).

Publication types