Centrifugation affects the purity of liquid biopsy-based tumor biomarkers
- PMID: 30551256
- PMCID: PMC6590195
- DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23641
Centrifugation affects the purity of liquid biopsy-based tumor biomarkers
Abstract
Biomarkers in the blood of cancer patients include circulating tumor cells (CTCs), tumor-educated platelets (TEPs), tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (tdEVs), EV-associated miRNA (EV-miRNA), and circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA). Because the size and density of biomarkers differ, blood is centrifuged to isolate or concentrate the biomarker of interest. Here, we applied a model to estimate the effect of centrifugation on the purity of a biomarker according to published protocols. The model is based on the Stokes equation and was validated using polystyrene beads in buffer and plasma. Next, the model was applied to predict the biomarker behavior during centrifugation. The result was expressed as the recovery of CTCs, TEPs, tdEVs in three size ranges (1-8, 0.2-1, and 0.05-0.2 μm), EV-miRNA, and ccfDNA. Bead recovery was predicted with errors <18%. Most notable cofounders are the 22% contamination of 1-8 μm tdEVs for TEPs and the 8-82% contamination of <1 μm tdEVs for ccfDNA. A Stokes model can predict biomarker behavior in blood. None of the evaluated protocols produces a pure biomarker. Thus, care should be taken in the interpretation of obtained results, as, for example, results from TEPs may originate from co-isolated large tdEVs and ccfDNA may originate from DNA enclosed in <1 μm tdEVs. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
Keywords: biomarker; centrifugation; circulating cell-free DNA; circulating tumor cells; exosomes; extracellular vesicles; flow cytometry; miRNA; microparticles; tumor-educated platelets.
© 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was carried out in the absence of any personal, professional, or financial relationship that could potentially be construed as a conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Matera J, Miller MC, Reuben JM, Doyle GV, Allard WJ, Terstappen LWMM, et al. Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351:781–791. - PubMed
-
- de Bono JS, Scher HI, Montgomery RB, Parker C, Miller MC, Tissing H, Doyle GV, Terstappen LWWM, Pienta KJ, Raghavan D. Circulating tumor cells predict survival benefit from treatment in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:6302–6309. - PubMed
-
- Cohen SJ, Punt CJA, Iannotti N, Saidman BH, Sabbath KD, Gabrail NY, Picus J, Morse MA, Mitchell E, Miller MC, et al. Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2009;20:1223–1229. - PubMed
-
- Coumans FAW, Doggen CJM, Attard G, de Bono JS, Terstappen LWMM. All circulating Epcam+Ck+Cd45− objects predict overall survival in castration‐resistant prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 2010;21:1851–1857. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
