Diagnostic accuracy of Candida albicans germ tube antibody for invasive candidiasis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: Candida albicans germ tube antibody (CAGTA) may be helpful as a marker for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis (IC). However, the performance has been variable. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of this assay for diagnosing IC.

Method: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Collaboration databases, reference lists of retrieved studies, and review articles. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and a summary receiver-operating characteristic curve of CAGTA for diagnosing IC were pooled using meta-analysis.

Results: A total of 976 patients (262 with proven or probable IC), included in 7 studies, were analyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios and area under the curve were 66% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 59% to 73%), 76% (95% CI, 58% to 88%), 2.8 (95% CI, 1.5 to 5.8), 0.44 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.57), 6 (95% CI, 3 to 5), and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.72), respectively. Heterogeneity of specificity was significant.

Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the CAGTA assay is moderate for IC. Since the CAGTA assay is not absolutely sensitive and specific for IC, the CAGTA results should be interpreted in parallel with other biomarkers and clinical findings.

Keywords: CAGTA; Diagnostic accuracy; Invasive candidiasis; Meta-analysis.