Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e024262.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024262.

Supported self-management for people with type 2 diabetes: a meta-review of quantitative systematic reviews

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Supported self-management for people with type 2 diabetes: a meta-review of quantitative systematic reviews

Mireille Captieux et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Self-management support aims to give people with chronic disease confidence to actively manage their disease, in partnership with their healthcare provider. A meta-review can inform policy-makers and healthcare managers about the effectiveness of self-management support strategies for people with type 2 diabetes, and which interventions work best and for whom.

Design: A meta-review of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed adapting Cochrane methodology.

Setting and participants: Eight databases were searched for systematic reviews of RCTs from January 1993 to October 2016, with a pre-publication update in April 2017. Forward citation was performed on included reviews in Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Proceedings. We extracted data and assessed quality with the Revised-Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR).

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Glycaemic control as measured by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was the primary outcome. Body mass Index, lipid profiles, blood pressure and quality of life scoring were secondary outcomes. Meta-analyses reporting HbA1c were summarised in meta-forest plots; other outcomes were synthesised narratively.

Results: 41 systematic reviews incorporating data from 459 unique RCTs in diverse socio-economic and ethnic communities across 33 countries were included. R-AMSTAR quality score ranged from 20 to 42 (maximum 44). Apart from one outlier, the majority of reviews found an HbA1c improvement between 0.2% and 0.6% (2.2-6.5 mmol/mol) at 6 months post-intervention, but attenuated at 12 and 24 months. Impact on secondary outcomes was inconsistent and generally non-significant. Diverse self-management support strategies were employed; no single approach appeared optimally effective (or ineffective). Effective programmes tended to be multi-component and provide adequate contact time (>10 hours). Technology-facilitated self-management support showed a similar impact as traditional approaches (HbA1c MD -0.21% to -0.6%).

Conclusions: Self-management interventions using a range of approaches improve short-term glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes including culturally diverse populations. These findings can inform researchers, policy-makers and healthcare professionals re-evaluating the provision of self-management support in routine care. Further research should consider implementation and sustainability.

Keywords: Supported Self-management; health policy; meta-review; primary care; quality In health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Meta-Forest plot of mean difference in HbA1c (variable time-points).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Meta-Forest plot of mean difference in HbA1c according to duration of follow-up a: Mean difference in HbA1c at follow-up ≤ 6months b: Mean difference in HbA1c at follow-up >6months to ≤ 12months c: Mean difference in HbA1c at follow-up >12months to ≤24months. RCT, randomised controlled trial.

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 7th International Diabetes Federation [article online, 2015. (Accessed 16 May 2018).
    1. Healthcare Commission. Improving services for people with diabetes [article online]. 2007. http://www.yearofcare.co.uk/sites/default/files/pdfs/Managing_diabetes.pdf (Accessed 16 May 2018).
    1. National Academies Press (US). : Adams K, Greiner AC, Corrigan JM, 1st Annual crossing the quality chasm summit: a focus on communities. Washington (DC: National Academies Press (US), 2004. - PubMed
    1. de Silva D. Helping people help themselves: A review of the evidence considering whether it is worthwhile to support self-management. 2011. http://www.health.org.uk/sites/health/files/HelpingPeopleHelpThemselves.pdf (Accessed 14 Jul 2017).
    1. Epping-Jordan JE, Pruitt SD, Bengoa R, et al. . Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:299–305. 10.1136/qshc.2004.010744 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types