Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e025230.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025230.

Understanding cauda equina syndrome: protocol for a UK multicentre prospective observational cohort study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Understanding cauda equina syndrome: protocol for a UK multicentre prospective observational cohort study

Julie Woodfield et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a potentially devastating condition caused by compression of the cauda equina nerve roots. This can result in bowel, bladder and sexual dysfunction plus lower limb weakness, numbness and pain. CES occurs infrequently, but has serious potential morbidity and medicolegal consequences. This study aims to identify and describe the presentation and management of patients with CES in the UK.

Methods and analysis: Understanding Cauda Equina Syndrome (UCES) is a prospective and collaborative multicentre cohort study of adult patients with confirmed CES managed at specialist spinal centres in the UK. Participants will be identified using neurosurgical and orthopaedic trainee networks to screen referrals to spinal centres. Details of presentation, investigations, management and service usage will be recorded. Both patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures will be assessed for 1 year after surgery. This will establish the incidence of CES, current investigation and management practices, and adherence to national standards of care. Outcomes will be stratified by clinical presentation and patient management. Accurate and up to date information about the presentation, management and outcome of patients with CES will inform standards of service design and delivery for this important but infrequent condition.

Ethics and dissemination: UCES received a favourable ethical opinion from the South East Scotland Research Ethics Committee 02 (Reference: 18/SS/0047; IRAS ID: 233515). All spinal centres managing patients with CES in the UK will be encouraged to participate in UCES. Study results will be published in medical journals and shared with local participating sites.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN16828522; Pre-results.

Keywords: cauda equina syndrome; cohort study; outcomes; spinal surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JW reports grants from the Wellcome Trust during this study. IH reports grants from the Association of British Neurologists/Patrick Berthoud Charitable Trust during this study. AABJ, SP, NS, MP, HR, AKD, PS, NE, PFXS and the BNTRC have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram. Time points for patient reported and clinician reported data collection in Understanding Cauda Equina Syndrome. (QoL: Quality of Life)

References

    1. Todd NV, Dickson RA. Standards of care in cauda equina syndrome. Br J Neurosurg 2016;30:518–22. 10.1080/02688697.2016.1187254 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fraser S, Roberts L, Murphy E. Cauda equina syndrome: a literature review of its definition and clinical presentation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:1964–8. 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balasubramanian K, Kalsi P, Greenough CG, et al. . Reliability of clinical assessment in diagnosing cauda equina syndrome. Br J Neurosurg 2010;24:383–6. 10.3109/02688697.2010.505987 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Todd NV. Causes and outcomes of cauda equina syndrome in medico-legal practice: a single neurosurgical experience of 40 consecutive cases. Br J Neurosurg 2011;25:503–8. 10.3109/02688697.2010.550344 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quraishi NA, Hammett TC, Todd DB, et al. . Malpractice litigation and the spine: the NHS perspective on 235 successful claims in England. Eur Spine J 2012;21:196–9. 10.1007/s00586-012-2203-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources