Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Feb;36(2):462-477.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0855-1. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

Pharmacokinetics of Prolonged-Release Once-Daily Formulations of Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Open-Label, Multicenter Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pharmacokinetics of Prolonged-Release Once-Daily Formulations of Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Open-Label, Multicenter Study

Nassim Kamar et al. Adv Ther. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Different prolonged-release formulations of tacrolimus are available. To date, the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT; Envarsus®) has not been compared with PR-Tac (Advagraf®) in de novo kidney transplant recipients. These profiles will guide clinical recommendations for the initiation and dose titration strategies of once-daily tacrolimus formulations.

Methods: This randomized, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter PK study randomized 75 de novo, adult, white kidney transplant recipients to LCPT 0.17 mg/kg/day (n = 37) or PR-Tac 0.20 mg/kg/day (n = 38) for 4 weeks. Dose adjustments were permitted to target a pre-defined therapeutic range based on measured trough blood concentrations.

Results: PK analysis (days 1, 3, 7 and 14) included 68 patients (LCPT, n = 33; PR-Tac, n = 35). Similar proportions of patients were within the pre-defined therapeutic tacrolimus trough blood concentration range, with < 12% in each group having below-target trough levels over the study period. LCPT demonstrated ~ 30% greater relative bioavailability [LCPT/PR-Tac adjusted geometric mean ratio: day 3, 1.32 (p = 0.007); day 7, 1.25 (p = 0.051); day 14, 1.43 (p = 0.002)] and ~ 30% lower peak-to-trough percentage fluctuation of blood concentration [LCPT/PR-Tac adjusted geometric mean ratio: day 3, 0.70 (p < 0.001); day 7, 0.68 (p < 0.001); day 14, 0.73 (p = 0.004)] in addition to longer time to maximum blood concentration (tmax), lower maximum concentration (Cmax) and a consistently lower daily dose (~ 40% dose reduction with LCPT vs. PR-Tac by day 28). Safety profiles were similar.

Conclusion: In de novo kidney transplant recipients, prolonged-release formulations of tacrolimus can reach therapeutic concentrations in the immediate post-transplant period. LCPT has greater relative bioavailability and lower peak-to-trough fluctuation compared with PR-Tac.

Trial registration: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; study number NCT02500212.

Funding: Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.

Keywords: Advagraf; De novo kidney transplantation; Envarsus; LCPT; PR Tac; Pharmacokinetics; Tacrolimus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient disposition. *Reasons for not receiving the allocated LCPT treatment (and being excluded from the safety and PK analysis populations) were: transplantation not performed (n = 2); patient did not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria (n = 1); study logistical issues (n = 1). Reasons for not receiving the allocated PR-Tac treatment (and being excluded from the safety and PK analysis populations) were: transplantation not performed (n = 1); patient withdrew consent (n = 1). Death due to coronary artery thrombosis. Discontinuation due to vascular graft thrombosis. §Excluded from the PK analysis for receiving only one dose of PR-Tac following the diagnosis of vascular graft thrombosis on study day 1. AE adverse event, LCPT LCP-tacrolimus, PK pharmacokinetic, PR prolonged release, CI confidence interval. Solid line represents 100%
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Between treatment group PK comparisons: a analysis of  % peak-to-trough fluctuation (PK population). b Analysis of dose-normalized AUC0–24h (PK population)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Concentration-time plots: a day 1; b day 3; c day 7; d day 14
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Daily dose of tacrolimus: a mean daily dose; b weight-adjusted mean daily dose
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mean serum creatinine (a) and mean eGFR (b)

References

    1. Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, Gustafson SK, Wilk AR, Robinson A, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2016 annual data report: kidney. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(Suppl 1):18–113. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14557. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(Suppl 3):S1–155. - PubMed
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Draft guidance on tacrolimus june 2016.
    1. Johnston A. Equivalence and interchangeability of narrow therapeutic index drugs in organ transplantation. Eur J Hosp Pharm Sci Pract. 2013;20(5):302–307. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2012-000258. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krzyzowska K, Kolonko A, Giza P, Chudek J, Wiecek A. No significant influence of reduced initial tacrolimus dose on risk of underdosing and early graft function in older and overweight kidney transplant recipients. Transpl Proc. 2018;50(6):1755–9. - PubMed

Publication types