Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;44(4):764-771.
doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-00606-5.

Are We Serving the Most At-Risk Communities? Examining the Reach of a South Carolina Home Visiting Program

Affiliations

Are We Serving the Most At-Risk Communities? Examining the Reach of a South Carolina Home Visiting Program

Elizabeth Radcliff et al. J Community Health. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

In addition to individual-level characteristics, characteristics of the social and physical environments in which individuals reside may adversely impact health outcomes. Careful attention to the role of "place" can result in programs that successfully deliver services to those most at risk. This retrospective, cross-sectional study used geocoded residential addresses from 3090 households enrolled in a South Carolina (SC) home visiting program, 2013-2016, and corresponding years of data for maternal and child health outcomes obtained from vital records data. ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) served as the primary geographic unit of analysis. ZCTAS with high volumes of birth or adverse maternal and child health outcomes for any of 10 indicators were flagged. Distribution of enrolled households across highest-risk ZCTAs was calculated. Of 379 ZCTAS with reported data, 152 had 8 or more risk flags. Of the 152 highest-risk ZCTAs, 33 also had high birth volumes. Fifty-seven of the 152 highest-risk ZCTAs had no enrollees; seven of the 33 highest-risk/highest-volume ZCTAS had no enrollees. Service delivery gaps existed despite a statewide, county-level needs assessment conducted prior to program implementation. This study suggests methods to identify service areas of need, as an ongoing effort toward program improvement.

Keywords: GIS; Geographic information systems; Home visiting; Program reach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1783-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1100-2 - PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:43-56 - PubMed
    1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Mar;57(3):186-99 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources