Repeatability of measuring knee flexion angles with wearable inertial sensors
- PMID: 30554906
- DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.11.002
Repeatability of measuring knee flexion angles with wearable inertial sensors
Abstract
Background: As assessment with inertial-measurement-units (IMUs) increases in research and in clinics, it is important to be aware of the repeatability of these sensors. The objectives of this experiment were to evaluate the measurement repeatability of IMU joint angles using a repeatable robot controller and an anthropomorphic leg phantom and to determine effects of joint speed and sensor positioning on the angles collected by these sensors. Comparisons to an electro-goniometer and three-dimensional (3D) motion capture cameras were also completed.
Methods: Two dual-IMU setups (posterior and lateral) were tested concurrently with an electro-goniometer and 3D motion capture cameras using a repeatable robot controller and a leg phantom. All modalities were attached to the phantom, which was flexed 10 times using a pre-programmed motion pathway during each test. Mean angles were compared across tests. Effects of joint speed, sensor re-positioning, and anatomical placement of the sensors on repeatability were assessed.
Results: Re-positioning caused greater deviation to the maximum and minimum angles than differences in speed. Overall, the means ± standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals of the maximum angles across all tests for the 3D camera markers, electro-goniometer, posterior IMUs, and lateral IMUs were 119.4 ± 0.3° (119.4, 119.5), 112.4 ± 0.5° (112.3, 112.5), 116.2 ± 2.4° (115.7, 116.7), and 118.3 ± 1.1° (118.1, 118.6).
Conclusions: Both posterior and lateral IMU setups demonstrated acceptable repeatability in measurement of range of motion that was advantageous to manual goniometer methods. Posterior and lateral IMU setups demonstrated overlapping standard deviations about their means.
Keywords: Inertial measurement unit; Motion; Range; Repeatability; Total knee replacement; Wearable sensor.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Knee deep in Error: Unraveling the accuracy limitations of consumer-grade wearable motion sensors with limited degrees of freedom computing knee joint angles.Comput Biol Med. 2025 Jul;193:110469. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110469. Epub 2025 May 29. Comput Biol Med. 2025. PMID: 40446544
-
Development of a body joint angle measurement system using IMU sensors.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:6923-6. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091743. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011. PMID: 22255930
-
Validation of a model-based inverse kinematics approach based on wearable inertial sensors.Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2018 Dec;21(16):834-844. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2018.1522532. Epub 2018 Nov 23. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2018. PMID: 30466324
-
Quantifying shoulder motion in the free-living environment using wearable inertial measurement units: Challenges and recommendations.J Biomech. 2025 Mar;182:112589. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112589. Epub 2025 Feb 17. J Biomech. 2025. PMID: 39987887 Review.
-
Determining anatomical frames via inertial motion capture: A survey of methods.J Biomech. 2020 Jun 9;106:109832. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109832. Epub 2020 May 11. J Biomech. 2020. PMID: 32517995 Review.
Cited by
-
Validation of a smartphone application and wearable sensor for measurements of wrist motions.J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2021 Dec;46(10):1057-1063. doi: 10.1177/17531934211004454. Epub 2021 Apr 19. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2021. PMID: 33874816 Free PMC article.
-
Accurate Prediction of Knee Angles during Open-Chain Rehabilitation Exercises Using a Wearable Array of Nanocomposite Stretch Sensors.Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 24;22(7):2499. doi: 10.3390/s22072499. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35408112 Free PMC article.
-
Consistency Is Key: A Secondary Analysis of Wearable Motion Sensor Accuracy Measuring Knee Angles Across Activities of Daily Living Before and After Knee Arthroplasty.Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jun 25;25(13):3942. doi: 10.3390/s25133942. Sensors (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40648199 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying the Problem Side with Single-Leg Squat and Hamstrings Flexibility for Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 1;60(9):1428. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091428. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 39336469 Free PMC article.
-
Sensor-based telerehabilitation system increases patient adherence after knee surgery.PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Feb 17;2(2):e0000175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000175. eCollection 2023 Feb. PLOS Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 36812639 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials