Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;48(7):897-908.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2530. Epub 2018 Aug 24.

Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain

Jan-Willem van Prooijen  1   2 , Karen M Douglas  3
Affiliations

Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain

Jan-Willem van Prooijen et al. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

In this introduction to the EJSP Special Issue on conspiracy theories as a social psychological phenomenon, we describe how this emerging research domain has developed over the past decade and distill four basic principles that characterize belief in conspiracy theories. Specifically, conspiracy theories are consequential as they have a real impact on people's health, relationships, and safety; they are universal in that belief in them is widespread across times, cultures, and social settings; they are emotional given that negative emotions and not rational deliberations cause conspiracy beliefs; and they are social as conspiracy beliefs are closely associated with psychological motivations underlying intergroup conflict. We then discuss future research and possible policy interventions in this growing area of enquiry.

Keywords: consequences; conspiracy theories; emotions; intergroup conflict; universal.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abalakina‐Paap, M. , Stephan, W. , Craig, T. , & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20, 637–647. 10.1111/0162-895X.00160 - DOI
    1. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge/Reading, MA: Addison‐Wesley.
    1. Andeweg, R. B. (2014). A growing confidence gap in politics? Data versus discourse In van Prooijen J.‐W. & van Lange P. A. M. (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 176–198). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 10.1017/CBO9781139565417 - DOI
    1. Bale, J. M. (2007). Political paranoia v. political realism: On distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics. Patterns of Prejudice, 41, 45–60. 10.1080/00313220601118751 - DOI
    1. Bartlett, J. , & Miller, C. (2010). The power of unreason: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter‐terrorism. London, UK: Demos.

LinkOut - more resources